[Pulp-dev] Pulp 3 Release Process Questions

Bryan Kearney bkearney at redhat.com
Tue Apr 24 12:22:13 UTC 2018

On 04/23/2018 02:57 PM, Patrick Creech wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-04-23 at 14:01 -0400, Robin Chan wrote:
>> I feel like the Travis change is recent enough that I'm not exactly sure how they differ from the Jenkins jobs. Are we all clear on these terminology? Aren't there multiple jobs running at different
>> times? I am not comfortable enough without the assurance that we are all talking about the same things to say we don't need "the Jenkins jobs". I would like for some of these discussions around
>> release process and where (and what and when)  different tests are run be a little bit more collaborative from the beginning rather than reactive post-change happening.
>> I'm all for making quick incremental changes. I'm happy that there are test results that are accessible to everyone. I don't want us to over thinking these, but are we sure we don't have any tests
>> that need to stay private (do we test for any security type things that might need to be embargoed before reported)? I want to make sure we think thing through before we start tearing stuff down.
> The build team, for one, has not had time yet to do an assessment on if travis will be able to provide all the packaging related items needed to generate RPMs.  There are also infrastructure security
> implications we have yet to analyze as well.  So, at least for rpm packaging requirements, these are still a big ? till we have time to evaluate.

Can someone summarize for me what there is Yet Another Process?

-- bk

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180424/f8e5fbf9/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list