[Pulp-dev] Using commits instead of PRs in Pulp 3 release notes

Brian Bouterse bbouters at redhat.com
Fri Dec 14 19:59:38 UTC 2018


Eric, yes can you tell us more about how Pulp could get into a setup like
that?

On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 2:44 PM Eric Helms <ehelms at redhat.com> wrote:

> On Katello and Foreman, we use a template and some code from a tool we use
> to do release activities to generate a formatted changelog that provides
> both sets of information (Redmine issue links and commit links) broken down
> by categories, see example at [1].
>
> I'd be happy to give more information on where and how we generate this if
> desired.
>
> [1] https://github.com/Katello/katello/blob/KATELLO-3.9/CHANGELOG.md
>
> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 2:29 PM Dana Walker <dawalker at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I feel like this is more accurate and comprehensive, but the initial
>> summary is less readable.  I could go either way.  Others?
>>
>> --Dana
>>
>> Dana Walker
>>
>> Associate Software Engineer
>>
>> Red Hat
>>
>> <https://www.redhat.com>
>> <https://red.ht/sig>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Dec 13, 2018 at 2:24 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Currently in our Pulp 3 release notes[0], we link to a query of PRs with
>>> the 3.0 tag merged in a certain timeframe. I feel like this is prone to
>>> user errors as in cases where we might forget to add the 3.0 label to a PR
>>> or get the timeframe slightly wrong because of timezones. I was thinking
>>> instead we could maybe link to the list of commits between tags. Here’s an
>>> example:
>>>
>>>
>>> https://github.com/pulp/pulp/compare/pulpcore-3.0.0b15...pulpcore-3.0.0b16
>>>
>>> If you click on any of these commits, there is a link to the PR by the
>>> branch name so I feel like there’s no loss of information.
>>>
>>> Thoughts?
>>>
>>> [0]
>>> https://docs.pulpproject.org/en/3.0/nightly/release-notes/pulpcore/3.0.x.html
>>>
>>> David
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20181214/538f57cd/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list