[Pulp-dev] CI not working on RHEL7 (for pulp_rpm)

[Milan Kovacik]

Folks,

It seems to me the F26 CI is still broken:
https://paste.fedoraproject.org/paste/RVrMq9GoBbiFfbqHVm03mA
https://pulpadmin.fedorapeople.org/jenkins/jobs/unittest-pulp_rpm-pr/builds/1155/node-type=f26-np.txt
But do we need F26? It's been unmaintained IIRC for about a month already.

--
milan

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:53 PM, Milan Kovacik <mkovacik at redhat.com> wrote:

> David, Patrick
>
> thanks for handling this!
>
> --
> milan
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:10 PM, David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> @milan, I thought you were gone for the day so I went ahead and opened a
>> PR to package libsolv:
>>
>> https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/47
>> <https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/47/commits>
>>
>> After it’s merged, I think RHEL should be good and hopefully your PR will
>> pass as well.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 2:35 PM Milan Kovacik <mkovacik at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Thanks for the feedback guys!
>>>
>>> @David, what in particular needs doing to carry the libsolv in Pulp
>>> repos?
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> milan
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:52 PM, David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agree we should carry the dependency until it’s released. The RHEL7
>>>> breakage is blocking QE currently so let’s revert the change[0] while
>>>> @milan and I can work on getting a PR open to pulp-packaging to get the
>>>> dependency into our repos.
>>>>
>>>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/46
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1:14 PM Patrick Creech <pcreech at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 18:33 +0200, Milan Kovacik wrote:
>>>>> > Folks,
>>>>> >
>>>>> > We've merged a package dependency requirement update[1] to make it
>>>>> possible for the rich-dependencies work to be mergeable[2].
>>>>> >
>>>>> > This has broken the EL7 builds
>>>>>
>>>>> So, often times we have needs to carry new/updated dependencies that
>>>>> aren't in an EL7 repo proper, and also not in the EPEL repos for
>>>>> maintaining our EL7 support.
>>>>>
>>>>> I do not think it'll be tenable to have EL7 support broken for any
>>>>> significant period of time.  Perhaps some discussions need to happen to
>>>>> have an updated libsolv carried in pulp's repos for some time
>>>>> untill a suitable version lands in a dependent repo.
>>>>>
>>>>> > Fedora 27&28 (stable) isn't affected.
>>>>> >
>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>> > milan
>>>>> >
>>>>> > [1] https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/45
>>>>> > [2] https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pull/1122
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>> > Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev____________
>>>>> ___________________________________
>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180712/05591051/attachment.htm>