[Pulp-dev] CI not working on RHEL7 (for pulp_rpm)

[Dennis Kliban]

We should remove F26 from the testing matrix. This will leave us with F27
and EL7 until we start building F28 packages.

On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 8:22 AM, Milan Kovacik <mkovacik at redhat.com> wrote:

> Folks,
>
> It seems to me the F26 CI is still broken: https://paste.fedoraproject.
> org/paste/RVrMq9GoBbiFfbqHVm03mA https://pulpadmin.
> fedorapeople.org/jenkins/jobs/unittest-pulp_rpm-pr/builds/
> 1155/node-type=f26-np.txt
> But do we need F26? It's been unmaintained IIRC for about a month already.
>
> --
> milan
>
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:53 PM, Milan Kovacik <mkovacik at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> David, Patrick
>>
>> thanks for handling this!
>>
>> --
>> milan
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 9:10 PM, David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> @milan, I thought you were gone for the day so I went ahead and opened a
>>> PR to package libsolv:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/47
>>> <https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/47/commits>
>>>
>>> After it’s merged, I think RHEL should be good and hopefully your PR
>>> will pass as well.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 2:35 PM Milan Kovacik <mkovacik at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the feedback guys!
>>>>
>>>> @David, what in particular needs doing to carry the libsolv in Pulp
>>>> repos?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> milan
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 7:52 PM, David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I agree we should carry the dependency until it’s released. The RHEL7
>>>>> breakage is blocking QE currently so let’s revert the change[0] while
>>>>> @milan and I can work on getting a PR open to pulp-packaging to get the
>>>>> dependency into our repos.
>>>>>
>>>>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/46
>>>>>
>>>>> David
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 1:14 PM Patrick Creech <pcreech at redhat.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, 2018-07-11 at 18:33 +0200, Milan Kovacik wrote:
>>>>>> > Folks,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > We've merged a package dependency requirement update[1] to make it
>>>>>> possible for the rich-dependencies work to be mergeable[2].
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > This has broken the EL7 builds
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, often times we have needs to carry new/updated dependencies that
>>>>>> aren't in an EL7 repo proper, and also not in the EPEL repos for
>>>>>> maintaining our EL7 support.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I do not think it'll be tenable to have EL7 support broken for any
>>>>>> significant period of time.  Perhaps some discussions need to happen to
>>>>>> have an updated libsolv carried in pulp's repos for some time
>>>>>> untill a suitable version lands in a dependent repo.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Fedora 27&28 (stable) isn't affected.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Cheers,
>>>>>> > milan
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > [1] https://github.com/pulp/pulp-packaging/pull/45
>>>>>> > [2] https://github.com/pulp/pulp_rpm/pull/1122
>>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>>> > Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>> > Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev____________
>>>>>> ___________________________________
>>>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20180712/022a3f5a/attachment.htm>