[Pulp-dev] black

Daniel Alley dalley at redhat.com
Tue Jun 18 02:42:43 UTC 2019


+0

On Mon, Jun 17, 2019 at 1:15 PM Brian Bouterse <bbouters at redhat.com> wrote:

> +1 to adopting this. Thank you @daviddavis for writing
>
> On Mon, Jun 10, 2019 at 1:58 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> I opened PUP-8 that proposes adopting black and pydocstyle[0] along with
>> a PR against pulpcore to demonstrate how it would change pulpcore's code.
>> Please review and respond with votes[2]. The deadline will be June 22, 2019.
>>
>> [0] https://github.com/pulp/pups/pull/17
>> [1] https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/pull/170
>> [2] https://github.com/pulp/pups/blob/master/pup-0001.md#voting
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 2:53 PM Simon Baatz <gmbnomis at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 08:25:47AM -0400, David Davis wrote:
>>> >    I wanted to get feedback from the Pulp community on using black[0]
>>> to
>>> >    auto-format our Pulp 3 code. I have some mixed feelings about it as
>>> I
>>> >    see some potential benefits of using it but also some downsides as
>>> >    well.
>>>
>>> +1 for black (pulp_cookbook uses black for a couple of months now).
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20190617/414bf3f9/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list