[Pulp-dev] Moving to travis-ci.com

[Brian Bouterse]

I don't know the answer to your question about capacity, but I've been
hitting this "not-updating-github" issue a lot recently. +1 to moving
everything to travis-ci.com.

On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 1:55 PM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:

> A week or two ago, build statuses for repos whose Ci is hosted on
> travis-ci.org failed to be reported back to Github. This thread in the
> Travis support forum about the issue[0] seems to recommend that we migrate
> off travis-ci.org. My one question is whether we'd experience more
> congestion if we had all our repos on travis-ci.com I know this has been
> an issue in the past.
>
> [0]
> https://travis-ci.community/t/github-status-not-posted-on-commits-on-repositories-using-legacy-service-integration/7798/14
>
> David
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20200422/7a5aaacc/attachment.htm>