[Pulp-dev] RPM stories, feedback is needed

[Tatiana Tereshchenko]

I'm looking for feedback on the stories below.  For both:
 - is the logic correct or if anything is missing?
 - where to store info (from a remote) which is needed later?

1. https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4458 As a user, I can configure which
checksum algorithm to use when creating metadata
 - the suggestion is to store a checksum type of a remote on a rpm repo
version model.

2. https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6055 As a user, my sync is not operational
if there are no changes
  - the suggestion is to store all the necessary details on a
rpm repository model.

Please comment on the issues (preferred) or discuss here.

Thank you,
Tanya
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20200127/2a723677/attachment.htm>