[Pulp-dev] RPM stories, feedback is needed

[Justin Sherrill]

Both of these look good to me

Justin

On 1/27/20 2:44 PM, Tatiana Tereshchenko wrote:
> I'm looking for feedback on the stories below.  For both:
>  - is the logic correct or if anything is missing?
>  - where to store info (from a remote) which is needed later?
>
> 1. https://pulp.plan.io/issues/4458 As a user, I can configure which 
> checksum algorithm to use when creating metadata
>  - the suggestion is to store a checksum type of a remote on a rpm 
> repo version model.
>
> 2. https://pulp.plan.io/issues/6055 As a user, my sync is not 
> operational if there are no changes
>   - the suggestion is to store all the necessary details on a 
> rpm repository model.
>
> Please comment on the issues (preferred) or discuss here.
>
> Thank you,
> Tanya
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20200127/391306e3/attachment.htm>