[Pulp-dev] Installer project

[David Davis]

We recently made a change to the automation so that it would start checking
projects and currently it's set up to check for the Pulp redmine project
for pulpcore changes[0]. So currently the answer would be yes. However,
we could change the commit validation to check for multiple projects.

[0] https://github.com/pulp/pulpcore/blob/master/template_config.yml#L38

David


On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 9:27 AM Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com> wrote:

> I am +1 to creating a new redmine project.
>
> I want to point out that we plan to move installer documentation into the
> main pulpcore docs. Our CI checks for issues associated with the
> appropriate projects. Do that mean we will need to create docs issues in
> the Pulp project when the docs need to be updated for the installer?
>
> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:25 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Cool. If we go down this path, would this plan make sense?
>>
>> 1. Create an installer project in redmine
>> 2. Move over all issues (opened and closed) to this project that are
>> tagged "Pulp 3 installer"
>> 3. Remove the "Pulp 3 installer" tag
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:10 AM Fabricio Aguiar <
>> fabricio.aguiar at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 for creating a new project,
>>> Installer query: https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/issues?query_id=154
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Fabricio Aguiar
>>> Software Engineer, Pulp Project
>>> Red Hat Brazil - Latam <https://www.redhat.com/>
>>> +55 11 999652368
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 11:48 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> During triage today, a majority of the issues that came up were for the
>>>> installer but only a handful of people could really speak to these issues.
>>>> I proposed that we skip these issues during triage and let the installer
>>>> team triage them.
>>>>
>>>> In order to do so, we'd have to create a separate project in redmine.
>>>> My initial feeling is that this makes sense since the installer work has
>>>> really grown into its own project and is no longer in the purview of
>>>> pulpcore.
>>>>
>>>> Thoughts?
>>>>
>>>> I'll put a deadline on this discussion for May 8 unless we don't reach
>>>> a consensus by then.
>>>>
>>>> David
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>>>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-dev mailing list
>> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20200508/49a477d3/attachment.htm>