[Pulp-dev] Installer project

Brian Bouterse bmbouter at redhat.com
Fri May 8 13:54:22 UTC 2020

On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 10:48 AM David Davis <daviddavis at redhat.com> wrote:

> During triage today, a majority of the issues that came up were for the
> installer but only a handful of people could really speak to these issues.
> I proposed that we skip these issues during triage and let the installer
> team triage them.
I agree with this observation, a triage where not everyone can speak to
issues isn't a good use of time. Overall I wonder if having an all-hands
triage makes sense anymore given the mini-teams organization these days.

> In order to do so, we'd have to create a separate project in redmine. My
> initial feeling is that this makes sense since the installer work has
> really grown into its own project and is no longer in the purview of
> pulpcore.
What about us reconfiguring the triage query to disinclude issues with the
installer tag on them as an alternative?

> Thoughts?
> I'll put a deadline on this discussion for May 8 unless we don't reach a
> consensus by then.
> David
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-dev mailing list
> Pulp-dev at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-dev
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-dev/attachments/20200508/3fa02bc7/attachment.htm>

More information about the Pulp-dev mailing list