[Pulp-list] Puppet in the CLI
Jason Connor
jconnor at redhat.com
Wed Aug 22 06:43:53 UTC 2012
I'm also leaning toward option 2, version 2.
I tried mental exercise on a 3rd version. Namely and auto-type detecting script, but you hung up on the help flag alone, so I don't think it'll fly.
O2V2 is, imo, the cleanest.
Jason L Connor
linear on freenode #pulp
http://pulpproject.org/
RHCE: 805010912355231
GPG Fingerprint: 2048R/CC4ED7C1
On Aug 21, 2012, at 9:40 AM, Jay Dobies <jason.dobies at redhat.com> wrote:
> https://fedorahosted.org/pulp/wiki/GCCLITypes
>
> When first adding the RPM extensions, I knew we'd have to figure something out when we supported Puppet but decided to hold off on the decision and see how things took shape.
>
> It's time to revisit the CLI structure and how to handle the fact that the Pulp team is now providing support for 2 different plugin packs, keeping in mind that that number may grow depending on what other types of content we decide to bite off and maintain as a team (or get contributed).
>
> The page above describes my thought process in how to handle our admin CLI with multiple types. I included some chat conversations with the community on what they think as well.
>
> It's pretty clear reading it which way I'm leaning. I'd like to come to a conclusion following the scrum meeting tomorrow, but I don't want to wait that long to hear any brilliant ideas you have on the issue since I'll probably start down a path this afternoon. So please reply to this or me personally if you have a strong opinion in any direction.
>
> --
> Jay Dobies
> Freenode: jdob @ #pulp
> http://pulpproject.org | http://blog.pulpproject.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
More information about the Pulp-list
mailing list