[Pulp-list] Docs Organization Proposal

Randy Barlow rbarlow at redhat.com
Fri Nov 21 22:05:40 UTC 2014

On 11/21/2014 04:32 PM, Jeff Ortel wrote:
> Although, I wonder if the 3.0 time frame would be more appropriate.
> Thoughts?

I think we can reorganize the docs with any release if we want to. I
don't think that violates semantic versioning. I wouldn't want to do it
to the docs from an already released version, but if we work out of
master and it just goes into some future release I think that's fine.

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20141121/7a08a0ee/attachment.sig>

More information about the Pulp-list mailing list