[Pulp-list] Feedback needed: new user/auth system in 3.0

Konstantin M. Khankin khankin.konstantin at gmail.com
Sun Aug 28 10:40:47 UTC 2016


I use PAM auth, which is in turn authenticates login requests through
FreeIPA. I don't create any roles other than admin though

2016-07-15 22:29 GMT+03:00 Michael Hrivnak <mhrivnak at redhat.com>:

> As many of you know, we are switching from mongodb to postgres in Pulp
> 3.0. This will come with quite a few changes. For one in particular, we
> need your input about how you use Pulp's user and permission system.
> Anything you can tell us about how you use the current user/perm system
> would be very helpful. We are considering the use of Django's built-in
> user/auth system [0] as a replacement for what Pulp currently has.
>
> If we hear silence, we might be more likely to change things, so let us
> know what is important to you.
>
> Have you integrated Pulp with a separate authentication source? Which one?
>
> Do you assign permissions to specific users? How granular do you need that
> to be?
>
> Have you created "roles" in Pulp?
>
> Anything else you want us to know or to think about?
>
> If you would like to provide input confidentially, you are welcome to
> contact me directly.
>
> [0] https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.8/topics/auth/
>
> Thank you!
> Michael
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>



-- 
Ханкин Константин
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20160828/7d101be7/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-list mailing list