[Pulp-list] Feedback needed: new user/auth system in 3.0

[Aurélien DESBRIÈRES]

Hum ... Hope I will have not to rebuild all once again.

On Sun, Aug 28, 2016, 12:41 PM Konstantin M. Khankin <
khankin.konstantin at gmail.com> wrote:

> I use PAM auth, which is in turn authenticates login requests through
> FreeIPA. I don't create any roles other than admin though
>
> 2016-07-15 22:29 GMT+03:00 Michael Hrivnak <mhrivnak at redhat.com>:
>
>> As many of you know, we are switching from mongodb to postgres in Pulp
>> 3.0. This will come with quite a few changes. For one in particular, we
>> need your input about how you use Pulp's user and permission system.
>> Anything you can tell us about how you use the current user/perm system
>> would be very helpful. We are considering the use of Django's built-in
>> user/auth system [0] as a replacement for what Pulp currently has.
>>
>> If we hear silence, we might be more likely to change things, so let us
>> know what is important to you.
>>
>> Have you integrated Pulp with a separate authentication source? Which one?
>>
>> Do you assign permissions to specific users? How granular do you need
>> that to be?
>>
>> Have you created "roles" in Pulp?
>>
>> Anything else you want us to know or to think about?
>>
>> If you would like to provide input confidentially, you are welcome to
>> contact me directly.
>>
>> [0] https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/1.8/topics/auth/
>>
>> Thank you!
>> Michael
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-list mailing list
>> Pulp-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ханкин Константин
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20160828/b0bd1e0b/attachment.htm>