[Pulp-list] Deprecating Pulp Nodes

David Davis daviddavis at redhat.com
Thu Dec 8 19:20:08 UTC 2016


Jeffrey,

That’s a great question. We are not in fact planning to support sync
schedules in 3.0. We’re encouraging users to use other tools like cron and
systemd timers instead. Here’s an overview of what we’re planning for Pulp
3.0:

https://pulp.plan.io/projects/pulp/wiki/Pulp_3_Minimum_Viable_Product


David

On Thu, Dec 8, 2016 at 9:36 AM, Miller, Jeffrey L <jeff-l-miller at uiowa.edu>
wrote:

> David,
>
>
>
> Is scheduling syncs also being removed? I see the blog post is using cron
> to sync or publish the repository instead of setting a schedule.
>
>
>
> -Jeffrey
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* pulp-list-bounces at redhat.com [mailto:pulp-list-bounces at redhat.com]
> *On Behalf Of *David Davis
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 8, 2016 8:08 AM
> *To:* pulp-list at redhat.com
> *Subject:* [Pulp-list] Deprecating Pulp Nodes
>
>
>
> We wrote a blog post about removing Nodes in Pulp 3.0 but I figured I'd
> sent out an email as well in order to increase visibility. Nodes will be
> officially deprecated in Pulp 2.12 and then removed in Pulp 3.0. For more
> information about why we deprecated Nodes and how you can reproduce their
> functionality using a standard install of Pulp, check out the blog post:
>
>
>
> http://pulpproject.org/2016/12/07/deprecating-nodes/
>
>
>
> Feel free to respond with any questions or concerns.
>
>
>
> David
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20161208/e8aee18c/attachment.htm>


More information about the Pulp-list mailing list