[Pulp-list] Can a Pulp server be a consumer of itself?

[Kodiak Firesmith]

See I think that's kind of odd.  I'd love to know the reasoning behind that
because we very much enjoy being able to treat the pulp server like every
other server w/r/t updates (unlike Satellite 5 & Satellite 6).

On Mon, May 2, 2016 at 2:44 PM, Konstantin M. Khankin <
khankin.konstantin at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Lutchy,
>
> I remember some piece of documentation saying "you'd better update pulp
> server not from itself, preferably from the internet"
>
> 2016-05-02 17:11 GMT+03:00 Lutchy Horace (Mailing List) <
> mailinglist.subscriptions at lhprojects.net>:
>
>> hi,
>>
>> > This is how I test the consumer code on my development environment.
>> > Seems like you should be able to do the same thing for your
>> > deployment. I would also appreciate input on this from others.
>>
>> I am bit awry of doing this on a production pulp server but I will give
>> this a shot. I assume I have to create a pulp repository within
>> pulp server itself for pulp-server updates.
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> --
>> Lutchy Horace
>> Owner/Operator/Administrator [http://www.lhprojects.net]
>> Owner/Operator/Administrator [http://www.bombshellz.net]
>> Owner/Operator/Administrator [http://www.animehouse.club]
>> About Me [http://about.me/lhprojects]
>> USA
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Pulp-list mailing list
>> Pulp-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Ханкин Константин
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pulp-list mailing list
> Pulp-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/pulp-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20160502/c421eb78/attachment.htm>