[Pulp-list] Pulp 2: Docker rsync distributors & Crane

[Dennis Kliban]

The POC for Crane looks good to me.

Story 3761 seems to be all about making a new rsync distributor for Docker.
Do you still see that as necessary?

On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Simon Baatz <gmbnomis at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 08:25:39AM -0400, Dennis Kliban wrote:
> >    On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 9:11 AM, Simon Baatz <[1]gmbnomis at gmail.com>
> >    wrote:
> ...
> >        Is there a way to enable protection for both the redirections and
> >        content? (I know that crane 3.2.0 supports Akamai CDN tokens, but
> >        that does not help with a local server.)
> >
> >    There is not a way to add content protection for the content itself
> >    right now.
>
> We prepared proof-of-concept code to deliver content from Crane/httpd
> directly without redirecting.  This allows to use basic
> authentication for all content.
>
> Commit is at [0] ("/v2" API endpoint only, no "X-Sendfile" support
> yet). This turned out to be pretty simple. Any feedback
> is welcome, of course.
>
>
> [0]: https://github.com/Telekom-PD/crane/commit/
> 7b065b1dd96281e31c96de61a03b3293b5c2bd89
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20180628/7e7f0091/attachment.htm>