[Pulp-list] Pulp 2: Docker rsync distributors & Crane

[Dennis Kliban]

Actually, let's move this discussion to the issue tracker[0].


[0] https://pulp.plan.io/issues/3761#note-2

On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 11:07 AM, Dennis Kliban <dkliban at redhat.com> wrote:

> The POC for Crane looks good to me.
>
> Story 3761 seems to be all about making a new rsync distributor for
> Docker. Do you still see that as necessary?
>
> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 11:59 AM, Simon Baatz <gmbnomis at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 08:25:39AM -0400, Dennis Kliban wrote:
>> >    On Wed, Jun 6, 2018 at 9:11 AM, Simon Baatz <[1]gmbnomis at gmail.com>
>> >    wrote:
>> ...
>> >        Is there a way to enable protection for both the redirections and
>> >        content? (I know that crane 3.2.0 supports Akamai CDN tokens, but
>> >        that does not help with a local server.)
>> >
>> >    There is not a way to add content protection for the content itself
>> >    right now.
>>
>> We prepared proof-of-concept code to deliver content from Crane/httpd
>> directly without redirecting.  This allows to use basic
>> authentication for all content.
>>
>> Commit is at [0] ("/v2" API endpoint only, no "X-Sendfile" support
>> yet). This turned out to be pretty simple. Any feedback
>> is welcome, of course.
>>
>>
>> [0]: https://github.com/Telekom-PD/crane/commit/7b065b1dd96281e31
>> c96de61a03b3293b5c2bd89
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/pulp-list/attachments/20180628/68931e12/attachment.htm>