xfs running with no x session
Rick Stevens
rstevens at vitalstream.com
Fri May 21 22:01:07 UTC 2004
Bruce McDonald wrote:
> Hello Rick
>
> On 21-May-04, you wrote:
>
>
>>Bruce McDonald wrote:
>>
>>>Hello,
>
>
>>>I was just checking what services were listening to ports on my machine
>>>and noticed that xfs (the font server, not the filesystem) was listening.
>>>Is this normal behaviour when there is not an x session running?
>
>
>>Yes, but it should be running on a local Unix-domain socket, not over
>>TCP/IP.
>
>
> It is running on a Unix socket. Having sent the previous question I figured
> that it must listen for X to start and then call the font server. It is
> good to be sure though.
Actually it's quite the opposite. X depends on having xfs handle fonts
for it, but xfs is not dependent on X in any way beyond X's font
directories.
If you might run the X server, leave xfs running. If you never use
X (e.g. a headless server), you can disable xfs if you wish. It's a
pretty lightweight process and really doesn't do anything unless it
gets a request on its socket. In other words, it's not a huge penalty.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
- Rick Stevens, Senior Systems Engineer rstevens at vitalstream.com -
- VitalStream, Inc. http://www.vitalstream.com -
- -
- Which is worse: ignorance or apathy? I don't know. Who cares? -
----------------------------------------------------------------------
More information about the Redhat-install-list
mailing list