EXIM - fallback to smarthost
Gary Stainburn
gary.stainburn at ringways.co.uk
Fri Oct 7 08:24:18 UTC 2005
Hi Ed
Long time no type ;)
On Thursday 06 October 2005 6:05 pm, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2005 at 04:44:30PM +0100, Gary Stainburn wrote:
> > My live server is Exim 3, but I'm in the process of updating to a
> > new box running Exim 4.
> >
> > I don't have a smarthost set and SMTP delivery is set direct as I
> > prefer this for both performance and logging reasons.
>
> You may prefer it but the target doesn't. That's why your email is
> being blocked.
>
> > However, I have just chaanged ISPs and for some reason my IP
> > address range is on an RBL.
>
> "For some reason"? Give us your IP address and we'll tell you why.
> There's a good chance that you're in a dynamic IP address range and
> that will be blocked by a LOT of hosts.
I have a leased line connection with a fixed IP subnet of
80.193.83.129/25 (I think the netmask is right)
This should not have been included on a dial-up RBL.
>
> > Is it possible with both versions to configure it so that it tries
> > to deliver directly, but fall back to my ISP's SMTP relay if it
> > fails.
>
> I don't think so. SMTP doesn't have an error for "we don't like your
> source address". The transaction is being rejected but you really
> don't know why - different servers reject with different messages and
> error codes.
Okay. What I get back is SMTP rejection error 550: which is
administrative rejection. The explanatory text I get back with it
states that it's been rejected because the source IP is on a RBL.
>
> What you can do with sendmail is to add mailertable entries for
> specific domains that will override the default smart host.
I think you can do similar with exim but don't know how. However, I had
hoped for it to be more robust and do it automatically if a direct send
fails.
>
> Personally, I gave up and send all email through my ISP.
The problem with this is performance. Even the techie at my ISP
admitted that this would seriously slow down email, which I can't
afford for my company. For a long time we've done more emails than
faxes, and now we're using email at least as much as voice phone calls.
>
> .../Ed
--
Gary Stainburn
This email does not contain private or confidential material as it
may be snooped on by interested government parties for unknown
and undisclosed purposes - Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act, 2000
More information about the redhat-list
mailing list