Traffic going to eth1 is goin
gabicr at gmail.com
Tue Jan 13 19:18:38 UTC 2009
post ifconfig -a
On Tue, Jan 13, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Ugo Bellavance <ugob at lubik.ca> wrote:
> I'm scratching my head on this one...
> I've configured a server with 2 network interfaces, eth0 and eth1. eth0 =
> 192.168.2.211 and eth1 = 192.168.2.212. eth1 seemed to work properly, but
> whenever I open a connection to 192.168.2.212, I see the traffic on eth0.
> Digging deeper led me to this finding. When there is an arp who-has
> 192.168.2.212, the arp reply contains the MAC address of eth0 instead of
> Both ports are connected to a Cisco Catalyst switch.
> Any idea of how this could happen and the solution? The only cause that I
> can think of is that at the beginning, I tried configuring bonding on this
> server, so both interfaces seemed to have the same MAC address, but I
> configured this bonded interface with only one IP address anyway, and I
> think it was in another subnet.
> Any idea welcome.
> redhat-list mailing list
> unsubscribe mailto:redhat-list-request at redhat.com?subject=unsubscribe
More information about the redhat-list