[Keyrings] Re: [redhat-lspp] Objects

[David Howells]

Chris Wright <chrisw at osdl.org> wrote:

> Evaluation includes complete TOE specification.  It's quite reasonable
> to conclude that labelled keyring support is not required considering
> its current usage.  However, we've informally agreed to add the LSM and
> kerying infrastructure required to have labelled keyring support.  Just
> hasn't made it that far up the priority list yet.

Keyring security handling changes are now more or less at the top of my list
of things to do. I'll compose a list of what I'm intending and post it shortly
for comments.

David