[rhelv6-list] [rhelv6-beta-list] RHEL7 mailing list

[Bryan J Smith]

I do not speak for anyone but m myself, a 20 year Linux Professional
involved with many projects.

All I stated is that capture and reuse works very well via other avenues.
Mailing lists get more limiting, and consistently revisit issues, at
10-25K+ users. Sun and Linux Managers mitigate this with a reply
off-list/Summary on-list approach.

Although I did find it humorous when at least two individuals stated they
did not care for Bugzilla. Kinda made my point for me. ;)
 On Apr 18, 2014 11:34 AM, "R P Herrold" <herrold at owlriver.com> wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2014, Eugene Vilensky wrote:
>
> > Forgive me for not reading the entirety of last-year's discussion on
> > the issue, but is it fair statement at this point that Red Hat, Inc.
> > won't be hosting a new mailing list for RHEL7 specific discussion?
> >
> > http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo
>
> The 'trailhead' for that discussion was over here:
>
> https://www.redhat.com/archives/rhelv6-beta-list/2013-December/thread.html
>
> and I came away with the conclusion that at Least Bryan J
> Smith (for whom I have great respect in some matters) who is
> at Red Hat) was strongly advocating for a migration to other
> support venue
>
> Problem as I see it is that some such venue do ,and some do
> not leave 'breadcrumbs' that others can follow and read, and
> major search engines find hidden nuggets in.  The thread
> petered out, and as you remark, no list for '7' (assuming for
> the sake of argument that which will be its name) has appeared
>
> Also the Red Hat acquisition and rework of the formerly
> independent CentOS communication venue seems substantially
> complete.  A later post also cites dissappointment as to
> information density
>
> No big deal.  I would rather light a candle than curse the
> darkness.  This will be my only post here on this matter
>
> Please feel free to join the mailing list at:
>         http://lists.clefos.org/mailman/listinfo/enterpriseseven-list
> if you are interested in the approach of an independent
> mailing list on the next major enterprise OS product (binary
> and 'from sources' rebuilds) from our host.  I would hope to
> run it with civility and to stay close on topic.  As need
> admits, additional lists are of course possible, but by and
> large, I hope that the RHEL and CentOS mailing lists venues
> will suffice for the next major release
>
> - -- Russ herrold
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAlNRb/UACgkQMRh1QZtklkSW5QCfZtVVgn84xOtcpa2+gnScQere
> MUkAn3f3sXo3pb+SOCWBjafYxNeJOeki
> =/H4O
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhelv6-beta-list mailing list
> rhelv6-beta-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhelv6-beta-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/rhelv6-list/attachments/20140418/82af69e6/attachment.htm>