[rhelv6-list] glibc-2.17-55.el7_0.1 (latest RHEL-7 update) is not available

inode0 inode0 at gmail.com
Mon Sep 1 15:24:55 UTC 2014


On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2014 at 6:30 AM, inode0 <inode0 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 31, 2014 at 1:20 PM, Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I know this list is for RHEL-6 but I'm posting an issue on RHEL-7
>>> hoping some RedHatter is reading the post.
>>>
>>> FYI, I have opened a support case (#01182854) but the responder did
>>> not 'get the message'. I also started a thread on the community
>>> discussion page. No response there. This is why I came to the mailing
>>> list. (end of preamble)
>>
>> Since the release of RHEL7 I have seen this happen multiple times on
>> the Workstation product. I have opened two tickets with Red Hat
>> support, called and reported it to customer service, reported it on
>> IRC in #rhel multiple times, and there is a thread on the forums about
>> why Red Hat doesn't seem to be able to monitor the CDN for these
>> failures without us notifying them about the missing updates every
>> time something goes wrong.
>
> Thank you for the note. I see the discussion thread:
>
> https://access.redhat.com/discussions/1134643
> "Does Red Hat bother to monitor its CDN for erratum delivery? Answer: no"
>
> Actually, the problem I wanted to talk about is not just the
> unavailability of a security package but more about the lack of a way
> to communicate with Red Hat. The US is in a 3-day weekend and it seems
> like no one is monitoring anything. The person who replied in the
> support case I opened was "clueless".
>
> By the way, I remember an argument against creating a mailing list for
> RHEL-7. I feel the mailing list is quite useful and, like in this
> case, it did provide useful info that I could not get through the
> support venue(s).

I could not agree with you more. In the past often I would get better
support response by using mailing lists where those who actually work
on the various products get a chance to see the problem report before
I spend a week trying to get through support channels.

Of course, with proper monitoring and response to it in this case we
shouldn't need to be dealing with support channels at all.

John




More information about the rhelv6-list mailing list