[rhn-users] RHN down; again

[Scott ANDERSON]

I think the downtime was an attempt to prepare for this update. Whether 
it was successful or not is yet to be determined.

Also, on a side note, does anyone know why RHEL 3.0 doesn't include the 
rpm for libsigc++? An older version of it exists in RHEL 2.1 and newer 
versions in Fedora. I have a new EDA software vendor who is asking me to 
install it, but the whole reason why I use RHEL 3.0 is to guarantee that 
all my workstations are stable for all the EDA software that my company 
uses.

Thanks,

Scott

Chris Stankaitis wrote:

> Daniel Wittenberg wrote:
>
>> I tend to agree though, they we are paying for Enterprise Class
>> resources, which should be able to handle "capacity on demand",
>> especially since they know ahead of time this will happen, and should
>> plan for it.
>>
>> Dan
>
>
> Not necessarly, they have to do a ROI based on the cost of adding that 
> extra capacity.. if z% of the time capacity X is more then sufficient 
> for Demand Y then is the extra cost of the small amount of the time 
> when capacity X is not enough for the demand worth it.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhn-users mailing list
> rhn-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users