[rhn-users] Using rhnreg_ks with multiple activation keys

[James P]

Wow. Right under my nose the whole time. And it works, too. Thanks 
for pointing me at the obvious.

Bret McMillan wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 03, 2004 at 12:17:20PM -0500, James P wrote:
> 
>>I'm running a RHN Satellite server with 3.4.0 on it, which is 
>>supposed to support registering a system using multiple activation 
>>keys. I can't get that feature to work, no matter how many different 
>>ways I pass the --activationkey=foo --activationkey=bar parameters 
>>to the rhnreg_ks command. No matter what I do, rhnreg_ks either 
>>gives me an error or simply registers with one of the keys but never 
>>with both.
>>
>>Has anyone out there got this to work? How should I be doing this?
> 
> 
> I believe the calling convention is comma (',') separated.  I believe
> the reasoning for this is that there is some importance in the order
> of the activation keys.
> 
> /me hunts around a little...
> 
> Ok, it was documented here (if you're logged in):
> 
> https://rhn.redhat.com/help/provisioning/s1-up2date-actkeys.html
> https://rhn.redhat.com/help/provisioning/s1-sm-systems.html#S3-SM-SYSTEM-KEYS-MULTIPLE
> 
> So, something like:
> 
> rhnreg_ks --activationkey=foo,bar,baz
> 
> --Bret
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> rhn-users mailing list
> rhn-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
>