[rhn-users] up2date won't update openoffice
James Harrison
jamesaharrisonuk at yahoo.co.uk
Thu Apr 28 15:06:27 UTC 2005
If you find a solution, please let me know.
I have a similar problem of dependencies WS RHEL3, dual Opteron openoffice is
one of them.
Thanks
--- Chuck Campbell <campbell at accelinc.com> wrote:
> I have two machines running RHEL3-U5. Both are dual Opteron, running
> 64 bit. Both are entitles. One is WS and one is ES. Both behave
> identically
> with respect to the information below.
>
> When I run up2date, it tells me there are three packages for upgrading.
>
> [root at cm up2date]# up2date --list
> Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: rhel-x86_64-es-3...
> Fetching Obsoletes list for channel: rhel-x86_64-es-3-extras...
> Fetching rpm headers...
> ########################################
> Name Version Rel
> ----------------------------------------------------------
> openoffice.org 1.1.2 24.2.0.EL3
> i386
> openoffice.org-i18n 1.1.2 24.2.0.EL3
> i386
> openoffice.org-libs 1.1.2 24.2.0.EL3
> i386
>
> when I try to update these I get the following:
>
> Testing package set / solving RPM inter-dependencies...
> ########################################
> RPM package conflict error. The message was:
> Test install failed because of package conflicts:
> The following packages were added to your selection to satisfy dependencies:
> Name Version Release
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> GConf2 2.2.1 4
> ORBit2 2.6.2 1
> bonobo-activation 2.2.2 1
> fam 2.6.8 15
> gnome-vfs2 2.2.5 2E.1
> libbonobo 2.2.3 1
> linc 1.0.3 1
> qt 3.1.2 13.4
> redhat-artwork 0.73.2 2E
> startup-notification 0.5 1
> libmng 1.0.4 3
>
> file /usr/share/man/man1/bonobo-activation-server.1.gz from install of
> bonobo-activation-2.2.2-1 conflicts with file from package
> bonobo-activation-2.2.2-1
>
>
> If I do an rpm -qa, I see that every one of these "packages added to your
> selection" is already installed, with an exact version and release match
> to the above list reported by up2date.
>
> I did an up2date -p to re-synchronize, but it made no difference. What
> gives?
>
> What do I do to get past this problem?
>
> thanks,
> -chuck
>
> _______________________________________________
> rhn-users mailing list
> rhn-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/rhn-users
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
More information about the rhn-users
mailing list