[scl.org] Suspicious collections in the listing all collections
mstuchli at redhat.com
Thu Sep 4 08:53:30 UTC 2014
That was meant for testing, must've forgotten to remove it afterwards.
It's gone now :)
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Marcela Maslanova" <mmaslano at redhat.com>
> To: "Honza Horak" <hhorak at redhat.com>, "Matej Stuchlik" <mstuchli at redhat.com>
> Cc: sclorg at redhat.com
> Sent: Thursday, September 4, 2014 6:17:10 AM
> Subject: Re: [scl.org] Suspicious collections in the listing all collections
> ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Honza Horak" <hhorak at redhat.com>
> > To: sclorg at redhat.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, September 2, 2014 12:18:04 PM
> > Subject: [scl.org] Suspicious collections in the listing all collections
> > Hi, I've found some items on
> > https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/ that I find rather
> > confusing, all from different reason. Please, help me identify false
> > positive before I report that as issues:
> > https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/dimazest/nlp/
> > "Unpublished: These SCLs are not listed publicly..." -- well, they are
> > publicly listed, since I see them when I'm not logged in.
> > https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/mstuchli/CoprCI/
> > This is actually not software collection, right? Why it is listed on
> > scl.org?
> > https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/scls/mbooth/eclipse-luna/
> > This copr has no builds assigned, or at least I see no '(not synced)'
> > there. Shouldn't we list only properly synced collections?
> > Maybe some if those is expected or desired, I could just not understand
> > the reason. Thanks for feedback.
> > Honza
> > _______________________________________________
> > SCLorg mailing list
> > SCLorg at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/sclorg
> Not sure about the first one. We don't see link to repo, but then why is it
> there? They guy
> shouldn't ask for hosting on scl.org if it's private.
> What about the second, Matej?
More information about the SCLorg