[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: [scl.org] Image naming for centos-based images



Quoting Honza Horak (2015-10-02 14:10:28)
> Tomasi, do you happen to see any potential troubles with Variant B 
> bellow, once OSBS is used in centos? like whether something like 
> centos/mariadb:10.0 or centos/mariadb:centos7 wouldn't be problem?
> 
> Honza

I can't see any troubles.

If docker/openshift accepts the name, we're fine.

Does the name conform to naming policy?

https://github.com/projectatomic/ContainerApplicationGenericLabels/blob/master/vendor/redhat/names.md

> On 10/02/2015 12:16 PM, Honza Horak wrote:
> > This is a follow-up for the meeting we had yesterday and which there are
> > minutes from at:
> > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/env-and-stacks/2015-October/000946.html
> >
> >
> > One thing that we couldn't solve without any OpenShift representative
> > was naming scheme for the centos images, that are based on SCL packages.
> > Those were originally called (mysql chosen as example):
> >    openshift/mysql-55-rhel7
> >    openshift/mysql-55-centos7
> >
> > the new versions are located under rhscl (RH internal registry) and
> > centos (docker hub) namespaces (variant A):
> >    rhscl/mariadb-100-rhel7
> >    centos/mariadb-100-centos7
> >
> > What we were thinking about yesterday was this scheme (variant B):
> >    rhscl/mariadb-100-rhel7
> >    centos/mariadb:10.0


[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]