[scl.org] [CentOS-devel] CentOS SCLo SIG sync-up meeting (2016-05-17)

Honza Horak hhorak at redhat.com
Tue May 17 14:34:04 UTC 2016

On 05/17/2016 04:14 PM, Karanbir Singh wrote:
> Hash: SHA1
> On 17/05/16 15:08, Honza Horak wrote:
>> On 05/17/2016 02:57 PM, Remi Collet wrote:
> I think all serious project have dropped dep. on this extension (and
>>> often only keep it as a fallback when openssl not availalble)
>>> - imap => missing libc-client
>>> So all is about, what should we do for dependencies not in base
>>> repository (but in EPEL).
>>  From my PoV it would be fine to use EPEL deps for packages in SCLo
>> (especially those that do not have a counterpart in RHSCL), but
>> I'm almost sure kbsingh and bstinson will be against -- am I right?
>> Is it a rule to use only packages built in CBS as deps>
>> Honza
> yeah, cant use deps from outside of cbs. you'd need to rebuild those
> deps from epel.

Do you have some estimation of how many packages would have to be needed?


More information about the SCLorg mailing list