[scl.org] How different is rh-postgresql94 from community Postgres 94?
hhorak at redhat.com
Mon Mar 6 11:31:11 UTC 2017
The biggest differences will be visible for admin, because
rh-postgresql95 uses concept of Software Collections
(https://www.softwarecollections.org/en/docs/) which means binaries are
put into alternate directory (/opt) and user needs to run `scl` command
to adjust $PATH first:
bash: psql: command not found...
$ scl enable rh-postgresql95 bash
psql: could not connect to server: No such file or directory
Also name of the service is different, rh-postgresql95 uses this name:
systemctl status rh-postgresql95-postgresql
And location of the data is different as well, by default data files are
As for the feature set and usage from remote server, I don't think there
are any differences, so applications won't see any difference IMO.
On 03/06/2017 12:22 PM, Aawardhan Logandan wrote:
> We install it from Upstream repository.
> In general what are the difference between postgresql95 and rh-postgresql95?
> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Honza Horak <hhorak at redhat.com
> <mailto:hhorak at redhat.com>> wrote:
> Hello Aawardhan,
> how do you install Postgres 9.5 in CentOS? Since it may be different
> answer for the two cases bellow:
> 1) install from CentOS SCLo SIG repos:
> yum install centos-release-scl-rh
> yum install rh-postgresql95
> 2) install from Upstream repos:
> yum install
> yum install postgresql95-server
> On 02/28/2017 06:28 AM, Aawardhan Logandan wrote:
> If my product is certified to run in Postgres 9.5 (tested in
> Cent OS),
> can I claim that it will work in rh-postgresql95?
> SCLorg mailing list
> SCLorg at redhat.com <mailto:SCLorg at redhat.com>
More information about the SCLorg