[scl.org] How different is rh-postgresql94 from community Postgres 94?
aawardhan at gmail.com
Mon Mar 6 11:34:26 UTC 2017
Thanks a lot !! that was helpful.
On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 5:01 PM, Honza Horak <hhorak at redhat.com> wrote:
> The biggest differences will be visible for admin, because rh-postgresql95
> uses concept of Software Collections (https://www.softwarecollectio
> ns.org/en/docs/) which means binaries are put into alternate directory
> (/opt) and user needs to run `scl` command to adjust $PATH first:
> $ psql
> bash: psql: command not found...
> $ scl enable rh-postgresql95 bash
> $ psql
> psql: could not connect to server: No such file or directory
> Also name of the service is different, rh-postgresql95 uses this name:
> systemctl status rh-postgresql95-postgresql
> And location of the data is different as well, by default data files are
> located at:
> As for the feature set and usage from remote server, I don't think there
> are any differences, so applications won't see any difference IMO.
> On 03/06/2017 12:22 PM, Aawardhan Logandan wrote:
>> We install it from Upstream repository.
>> In general what are the difference between postgresql95 and
>> On Mon, Mar 6, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Honza Horak <hhorak at redhat.com
>> <mailto:hhorak at redhat.com>> wrote:
>> Hello Aawardhan,
>> how do you install Postgres 9.5 in CentOS? Since it may be different
>> answer for the two cases bellow:
>> 1) install from CentOS SCLo SIG repos:
>> yum install centos-release-scl-rh
>> yum install rh-postgresql95
>> 2) install from Upstream repos:
>> yum install
>> yum install postgresql95-server
>> On 02/28/2017 06:28 AM, Aawardhan Logandan wrote:
>> If my product is certified to run in Postgres 9.5 (tested in
>> Cent OS),
>> can I claim that it will work in rh-postgresql95?
>> SCLorg mailing list
>> SCLorg at redhat.com <mailto:SCLorg at redhat.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the SCLorg