[Spacewalk-list] Re: [Spacewalk-devel] Need for 3 "views" of channels?

[Jesus M. Rodriguez]

On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 12:44 PM, Mike McCune <mmccune at redhat.com> wrote:
> Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>
>> Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>>
>>> Justin Sherrill wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> On the "Channels" page we currently have 3 different lists ("Relevant",
>>>> "All", and "Retired").  This made sense for hosted, but for us can we rip
>>>> out the "Relevant" and "Retired" lists?
>>>>
>>>> Currently a channel is relevant if it is x86 (32bit),  you have a system
>>>> subscribed to it, or it is a custom channel.  IMHO a channel should be
>>>> relevant if it exists on the satellite.
>>>
>>> -1
>>> We have in Brno satellite with a lot of channels in several arch (i386,
>>> x86_64, ppc) and if I have only i386 machine registered to this satellite,
>>> the "Relevant" shows only relevant (ie. i386) channels.
>>>
>>> My vote say: leave it as it is.
>>
>> OK, my previous comment was crap. Now I tried it and you are correct. But
>> I still do not agree that "Relevant" should display all available on sat.
>> How I would like it:
>> "Relevant" - channels to which my login have registered at least one
>> machine.
>> "All" - channels to which my organization have entitlements.
>> "Retired" - Dunno, how many users have something there...
>
> I think the above is actually how people expect it to work.  The question
> is, on a fresh Satellite with no systems registered, we may want "Relevant"
> to actually show something, which is why I think i386 always shows up.
>
> Perhaps it should be:
>
> "Relevant" - channels to which my login have registered at least one
> machine.  If no machines, show same as All.

+1 with modification :) add a message at the top stating "No systems
found, showing All available channels"
then show the entire list.

> "All" - channels to which my organization have entitlements.
> "Retired" - leave as-is.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-devel mailing list
> Spacewalk-devel at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-devel
>