[Spacewalk-list] spacewalk package install

[James Hogarth]

Anaconda is definately arch aware now for centos 5.4 at the least...

I install firefox.x86_64 on our systems specifically to avoid getting
firefox.i386 and the relevant 32bit libraries that come with it

2009/12/17 Colin Coe <colin.coe at gmail.com>

> For RHEL5 this definitely works but is only required if, for example,
> a package with the same name exists for both i386 and x86_64.  I.e.
> foo-1.1el5.x86_64 and foo-1.1el5.i386
>
> For an internal packaging of the netbackup client, I used to include
> acl.i386 in the list of packages in my kickstarts.
>
> CC
>
> On 12/16/09, John Hodrien <J.H.Hodrien at leeds.ac.uk> wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Dec 2009, Josh.Mullis at cox.com wrote:
> >
> > > Not sure if it will work, but try tagging a ".i386" to the end of the
> > package name.
> > >
> >
> > I could be wrong, but anaconda used to be arch unaware.  Hopefully I'm
> wrong
> > and this is fixed now.  Packages otherwise could be specified like this
> with
> > an activation key, or installed with yum in a postscript.
> >
> > jh
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
> >
>
>
> --
> RHCE#805007969328369
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20091217/996af571/attachment.htm>