[Spacewalk-list] question about red hat

[Michiel van Es]

Charles Leaver wrote:
> On 2009/06/16 1:26 PM, "Michiel van Es" <michiele at info.nl> wrote:
>> Isn't that a license problem if you use 1 RHN license to get the updates
>> tot the spacewalk server and then let multiple Red Hat servers connect
>> to your spacewalk repo (not using the RHN license) ?
> 
> No. Red Hat have decided that just for people who install Spacewalk servers,
> "licensing" (Red Hat hate calling it licensing) does not apply. Of course
> it's a problem if you do that!!!!
> 
Besides it is a license issue, is it technically possible?
And if it is a license problem how would they suppress it?
It is just a question not an attack or some propaganda about
illegal/misuse of RHN.

I mean: isn't the same being used for CentOS?
One has can access all Red Hat updates but can use them a little bit
repackaged for CentOS ? Hence..same we use Spacewalk instead of
Satellite server?

Kind regards and chill out.

Michiel


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 258 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20090616/4768bc2e/attachment.sig>