[Spacewalk-list] Re: Architecture not specified on CentOS4 servers

James Garratt jngarratt at gmail.com
Mon May 11 22:59:38 UTC 2009


one thing i forgot to mention is that these hosts were crossgraded from
RHEL4 however i believe all the CentOS5 hosts were fresh installs. so it
could be an issue related to the crossgrade?
cheers
-JG

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 5:44 PM, James Garratt <jngarratt at gmail.com> wrote:

> Can't find anything about this on the list or anywhere else. I'm open to
> suggestions.
>
> I've got several channels and sub channels setup.
> Hosts in the CentOS 5 channels work fine.
>
> Host in the CentOS 4 channels have "not specified" under Architecture when
> you list packages.
> Also the Overview page indicates a number of packages require upgrading but
> when you click on the link or go to packages->upgrade the list is empty.
>
> I noticed that the architecture is populated during rhnreg_ks but once it
> completes the arch becomes "not specified" and the upgrade page becomes an
> empty list.
>
> I've tried both the up2date package from a CentOS repo and the one provided
> at http://stahnma.fedorapeople.org/spacewalk-tools/4/$arch
>
>
> Cheers
> -JG
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20090512/969fc590/attachment.htm>


More information about the Spacewalk-list mailing list