[Spacewalk-list] Dropping i386 for Spacewalk Server?

[Scott Rakow]

Some clients we have are running i386, but the Spacewalk server its self is
64-bit, so the client end you may want to keep as 32-bit

2011/3/24 Miroslav Suchý <msuchy at redhat.com>

> Dear users of Spacewalk,
> I was thinking about dropping i386 architecture for Spacewalk server.
> Client tools will be still build and released for i386. But servers
> itself not.
> All current HW is 64bit but Atoms. And Atom is not the best choice for
> Spacewalk. So I do not see reason for i386.
>
> But before I head shot i386 architecture, I'm asking: Does somebody use
> i386 architecture? If yes can you migrate to x86_64? Will you miss i386
> architecture?
>
> I anticipate that a lots of people will not miss i386 architecture, so
> please reply only if you will miss it. Even better if you will write
> your story, why you can not use x86_64.
> --
> Miroslav Suchy
> Red Hat Satellite Engineering
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20110325/5deb9738/attachment.htm>