[Spacewalk-list] SEVERE: Can't find free port 8009 8019

john miller johnmille1 at gmail.com
Thu Apr 11 19:19:11 UTC 2013


I had the same issue on 1.7. It only got duplicated 8 to 10 times though.
Is there a reason why this happens or a way I can prevent it from happening?

On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 8:50 AM, Winther, Hinrich <hwinther at uni-mainz.de>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> We had the same issue. Somehow the entry:
>
> <Connector port="8009" protocol="AJP/1.3" redirectPort="8443"
> URIEncoding="UTF-8" address="127.0.0.1"/>
> <Connector port="8009" protocol="AJP/1.3" redirectPort="8443"
> URIEncoding="UTF-8" address="::1"/>
>
> in the file /etc/tomcat6/server.xml got duplicated 16385 times. Simply
> delete the extra ones and everything should work fine.
>
> Regards,
> hwinther.
> ________________________________________
> Von: spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com [spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com]"
> im Auftrag von "Jan Hutař [jhutar at redhat.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 9. Juli 2012 09:33
> An: redhat at nmoura.eti.br; spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> Cc: spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> Betreff: Re: [Spacewalk-list] SEVERE: Can't find free port 8009 8019
>
> On Mon, 2 Jul 2012 17:27:23 -0300 Nilton Moura
> <redhat at nmoura.eti.br> wrote:
>
> > Hi list,
> >
> > On Spacewalk 1.6 startup process, the tomcat log shows that
> > tomcat6 tries to bind from 8009 to 8019 ports, but it can't.
> >
> > Jul 2, 2012 5:02:15 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init
> > INFO: Port busy 8009 java.net.BindException: Address already
> > in use Jul 2, 2012 5:02:15 PM
> > org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init INFO: Port busy 8010
> > java.net.BindException: Address already in use Jul 2, 2012
> > 5:02:15 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init INFO: Port
> > busy 8011 java.net.BindException: Address already in use Jul
> > 2, 2012 5:02:15 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init
> > INFO: Port busy 8012 java.net.BindException: Address already
> > in use Jul 2, 2012 5:02:15 PM
> > org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init INFO: Port busy 8013
> > java.net.BindException: Address already in use Jul 2, 2012
> > 5:02:15 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init INFO: Port
> > busy 8014 java.net.BindException: Address already in use Jul
> > 2, 2012 5:02:15 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init
> > INFO: Port busy 8015 java.net.BindException: Address already
> > in use Jul 2, 2012 5:02:15 PM
> > org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init INFO: Port busy 8016
> > java.net.BindException: Address already in use Jul 2, 2012
> > 5:02:15 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init INFO: Port
> > busy 8017 java.net.BindException: Address already in use Jul
> > 2, 2012 5:02:15 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init
> > INFO: Port busy 8018 java.net.BindException: Address already
> > in use Jul 2, 2012 5:02:15 PM
> > org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init INFO: Port busy 8019
> > java.net.BindException: Address already in use Jul 2, 2012
> > 5:02:15 PM org.apache.jk.common.ChannelSocket init SEVERE:
> > Can't find free port 8009 8019 Jul 2, 2012 5:02:15 PM
> > org.apache.jk.server.JkMain start INFO: Jk running ID=0
> > time=1/10  config=null Jul 2, 2012 5:02:16 PM
> > org.apache.catalina.startup.Catalina start INFO: Server
> > startup in 32926 ms
> >
> > But these ports are already binded (ipv6):
> >
> > $ sudo netstat -ntlp|grep :80..
> > tcp        0      0 ::1:8011                    :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::ffff:127.0.0.1:8011       :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::1:8012                    :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::ffff:127.0.0.1:8012       :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::1:8013                    :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::ffff:127.0.0.1:8013       :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::1:8014                    :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::ffff:127.0.0.1:8014       :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::1:8015                    :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::ffff:127.0.0.1:8015       :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::1:8016                    :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::ffff:127.0.0.1:8016       :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::ffff:127.0.0.1:8080       :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 :::80                       :::*
> >  LISTEN      1750/httpd
> > tcp        0      0 ::1:8017                    :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::ffff:127.0.0.1:8017       :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::1:8018                    :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::ffff:127.0.0.1:8018       :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::1:8019                    :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::ffff:127.0.0.1:8019       :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::ffff:127.0.0.1:8005       :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::1:8009                    :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::ffff:127.0.0.1:8009       :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::1:8010                    :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> > tcp        0      0 ::ffff:127.0.0.1:8010       :::*
> >  LISTEN      1672/java
> >
> > Does anybody knows if this is because it tries to bind on ipv4
> > address too? Should I disable ipv6 support on my OS?
> >
> > Thanks in advance,
> > Nilton.
>
> Is this causing some functionality problems, or is it just error
> log message (probably important though)?
>
> What is that java pid 1672 process? Is it tomcat as well?
>
> Regards,
> Jan
>
>
>
> --
> Jan Hutar     Systems Management QA
> jhutar at redhat.com     Red Hat, Inc.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20130411/bb803107/attachment.htm>


More information about the Spacewalk-list mailing list