[Spacewalk-list] Repo woes

Mon Aug 5 22:06:18 UTC 2013

change the architecture to x86_64 for the repo..then try and sync

On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:50 PM, Dimitri Yioulos <dyioulos at onpointfc.com>wrote:

> On the Spacewalk server?
>
> With respect, what difference should it make?  The Spacewalk
> server is built on CentOS 6, but has Spacewalk repos for
> CentOS 5 that sync just fine.
>
> Dimitri
>
>
> On Monday 05 August 2013 4:34:10 pm Thomas Foster wrote:
> > What's the output of yum repolist ?
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Dimitri Yioulos
> <dyioulos at onpointfc.com>wrote:
> > > Thomas,
> > >
> > > Yes, and yes.
> > >
> > > Dimitri
> > >
> > > On Monday 05 August 2013 4:00:26 pm Thomas Foster wrote:
> > > > Did you just add the repo?  If so, did you yum clean
> > > > metadata?
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Lewis Donofrio
> > >
> > > <lewis.donofrio at gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > > I'm new here but why not use 2nd party Centos
> > > > > repo's for samba?
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > ___________________________________________________
> > > > >____ ____________
> > > > > https://www.vizify.com/lewis-donofrio -
> > > > > 734-743-1743
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Dimitri Yioulos
> > >
> > > <dyioulos at onpointfc.com>wrote:
> > > > >> H, all.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> I recently upgraded Spacewalk to the latest and
> > > > >> greatest from version 1.8.  Unfortunately, the
> > > > >> upgrade didn't go well, and all of my settings
> > > > >> were lost.  The silver lining here is that, by
> > > > >> recreating everything, I learned a lot (or, at
> > > > >> least, refreshed my memory).
> > > > >>
> > > > >> However, I'm having a problem getting on recreated
> > > > >> cahnnel/repo working.  Many of our Linux boxes use
> > > > >> Samba; the packages come from Sernet.  I created
> > > > >> the channel and repo for my CentOS 5 systems, but
> > > > >> the repo won't sync. When I try to sync from the
> > > > >> command line, here's the output I get:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> spacewalk-repo-sync --channel sernet-samba-el5
> > > > >> --type yum Repo URL:
> > > > >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5 Packages
> > > > >> in repo:                22
> > > > >> Packages already synced:          0
> > > > >> Packages to sync:                22
> > > > >> 1/22 : samba3-utils-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > >> 2/22 : samba3-winbind-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > >> 3/22 : libsmbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > >> 4/22 : libwbclient0-32bit-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> 5/22 : libwbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > >> 6/22 : samba3-doc-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > >> 7/22 : libwbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > >> 8/22 : samba3-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > >> 9/22 : samba3-debuginfo-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > >> 10/22 : samba3-client-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > >> 11/22 : libsmbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > > >> 12/22 : samba3-winbind-32bit-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> 13/22 : samba3-winbind-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> 14/22 : libwbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> 15/22 : samba3-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> 16/22 : samba3-client-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> 17/22 : samba3-debuginfo-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> 18/22 : libsmbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> 19/22 : samba3-doc-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> 20/22 : libsmbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> 21/22 : samba3-utils-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> 22/22 : libwbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > > >> Linking packages to channel.
> > > > >> ERROR: Package arch x86_64 incompatible with
> > > > >> channel sernet-samba-el5
> > > > >> Sync completed.
> > > > >> Total time: 0:00:06
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The machines to be updated are 32-bit.  I chose
> > > > >> IA-32 as the Architecture, and the repo url is
> > > > >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5.  If I
> > > > >> make it
> > > > >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5/i386, I
> > > > >> get "ERROR: Cannot retrieve repository metadata
> > > > >> (repomd.xml) for repostory: sernet-samba-el5.
> > > > >> Please verify its path and try again.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> What's frustrating is that I did have this working
> > > > >> before. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Dimitri
> > > > >>
> > > > >> --
> > > > >> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > > >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > > >> believed to be clean.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > > >> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > > > >> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > > > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-
> > > > >>list
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > > > > Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-l
> > > > >ist
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > believed to be clean.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > > Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
>
>
> --
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20130805/5dadd5b2/attachment.htm>