[Spacewalk-list] 1.9 to 2.0 Upgrade

Shawn Cannon shawn at shawncannon.com
Thu Dec 5 14:59:28 UTC 2013


I am trying to upgrade from 1.9 to 2.0 on my CentOS 6.x server.  I am following the instructions here: https://fedorahosted.org/spacewalk/wiki/HowToInstall
After the yum upgrade command, it apparently did not find spacewalk 2.0 to upgrade it so I am still running 1.9.  How can I get this upgraded?  Any ideas?

Shawn Cannon

IT ProfessionalEMC Elect 2013 | Dell TechCenter Rockstar 2013 | VMware vExpert 2013

http://vtech411.com


> From: spacewalk-list-request at redhat.com
> Subject: Spacewalk-list Digest, Vol 63, Issue 6
> To: spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 16:34:15 -0400
> 
> Send Spacewalk-list mailing list submissions to
> 	spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> 
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> 	https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> 	spacewalk-list-request at redhat.com
> 
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> 	spacewalk-list-owner at redhat.com
> 
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of Spacewalk-list digest..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: Repo woes (Thomas Foster)
>    2. Re: Repo woes (Dimitri Yioulos)
>    3. Re: Repo woes (Dimitri Yioulos)
>    4. Re: Repo woes (Thomas Foster)
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 16:00:26 -0400
> From: Thomas Foster <thomas.foster80 at gmail.com>
> To: spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Repo woes
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAJ44rp5drH1C6B7KXoYTRa30fDEyquf7ju4MoKCDTC9NYM_imw at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> Did you just add the repo?  If so, did you yum clean metadata?
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Lewis Donofrio <lewis.donofrio at gmail.com>wrote:
> 
> > I'm new here but why not use 2nd party Centos repo's for samba?
> >
> > --
> > ___________________________________________________________________
> > https://www.vizify.com/lewis-donofrio - 734-743-1743
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Dimitri Yioulos <dyioulos at onpointfc.com>wrote:
> >
> >> H, all.
> >>
> >> I recently upgraded Spacewalk to the latest and greatest
> >> from version 1.8.  Unfortunately, the upgrade didn't go
> >> well, and all of my settings were lost.  The silver lining
> >> here is that, by recreating everything, I learned a lot
> >> (or, at least, refreshed my memory).
> >>
> >> However, I'm having a problem getting on recreated
> >> cahnnel/repo working.  Many of our Linux boxes use Samba;
> >> the packages come from Sernet.  I created the channel and
> >> repo for my CentOS 5 systems, but the repo won't sync.
> >> When I try to sync from the command line, here's the output
> >> I get:
> >>
> >> spacewalk-repo-sync --channel sernet-samba-el5 --type yum
> >> Repo URL: http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5
> >> Packages in repo:                22
> >> Packages already synced:          0
> >> Packages to sync:                22
> >> 1/22 : samba3-utils-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> >> 2/22 : samba3-winbind-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> >> 3/22 : libsmbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> >> 4/22 : libwbclient0-32bit-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> >> 5/22 : libwbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> >> 6/22 : samba3-doc-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> >> 7/22 : libwbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> >> 8/22 : samba3-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> >> 9/22 : samba3-debuginfo-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> >> 10/22 : samba3-client-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> >> 11/22 : libsmbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> >> 12/22 : samba3-winbind-32bit-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> >> 13/22 : samba3-winbind-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> >> 14/22 : libwbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> >> 15/22 : samba3-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> >> 16/22 : samba3-client-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> >> 17/22 : samba3-debuginfo-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> >> 18/22 : libsmbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> >> 19/22 : samba3-doc-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> >> 20/22 : libsmbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> >> 21/22 : samba3-utils-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> >> 22/22 : libwbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> >> Linking packages to channel.
> >> ERROR: Package arch x86_64 incompatible with channel
> >> sernet-samba-el5
> >> Sync completed.
> >> Total time: 0:00:06
> >>
> >> The machines to be updated are 32-bit.  I chose IA-32 as the
> >> Architecture, and the repo url is
> >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5.  If I make it
> >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5/i386, I
> >> get "ERROR: Cannot retrieve repository metadata
> >> (repomd.xml) for repostory: sernet-samba-el5. Please verify
> >> its path and try again.
> >>
> >> What's frustrating is that I did have this working before.
> >> Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> >>
> >> Dimitri
> >>
> >> --
> >> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> >> believed to be clean.
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> >> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20130805/7eb6b39b/attachment.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 16:09:01 -0400
> From: Dimitri Yioulos <dyioulos at onpointfc.com>
> To: spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Repo woes
> Message-ID: <201308051609.01795.dyioulos at onpointfc.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> (Can I assume that top-posting on this list is OK?).
> 
> Because they arrive much sooner than the native packages.  
> Sernet usually creates the RPMs from the Samba Team's work 
> within a couple of days of release.  I've used them for 
> years with few problems.  From samba.org --> 
> enterprisesamba.org:
> 
> "Since late 2003 SerNet provides Samba packages for 
> enterprise ready Linux distributions, e.g. Red Hat 
> Enterprise Server and Novell's SuSE Linux Enterprise 
> Server, available on SerNet's download server."
> 
> Dimitri
> 
> 
> On Monday 05 August 2013 3:41:26 pm Lewis Donofrio wrote:
> > I'm new here but why not use 2nd party Centos repo's for
> > samba?
> >
> > --
> > _________________________________________________________
> >__________ https://www.vizify.com/lewis-donofrio -
> > 734-743-1743
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Dimitri Yioulos 
> <dyioulos at onpointfc.com>wrote:
> > > H, all.
> > >
> > > I recently upgraded Spacewalk to the latest and
> > > greatest from version 1.8.  Unfortunately, the upgrade
> > > didn't go well, and all of my settings were lost.  The
> > > silver lining here is that, by recreating everything, I
> > > learned a lot (or, at least, refreshed my memory).
> > >
> > > However, I'm having a problem getting on recreated
> > > cahnnel/repo working.  Many of our Linux boxes use
> > > Samba; the packages come from Sernet.  I created the
> > > channel and repo for my CentOS 5 systems, but the repo
> > > won't sync. When I try to sync from the command line,
> > > here's the output I get:
> > >
> > > spacewalk-repo-sync --channel sernet-samba-el5 --type
> > > yum Repo URL: http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5
> > > Packages in repo:                22
> > > Packages already synced:          0
> > > Packages to sync:                22
> > > 1/22 : samba3-utils-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > 2/22 : samba3-winbind-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > 3/22 : libsmbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > 4/22 : libwbclient0-32bit-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > 5/22 : libwbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > 6/22 : samba3-doc-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > 7/22 : libwbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > 8/22 : samba3-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > 9/22 : samba3-debuginfo-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > 10/22 : samba3-client-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > 11/22 : libsmbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > 12/22 : samba3-winbind-32bit-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > 13/22 : samba3-winbind-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > 14/22 : libwbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > 15/22 : samba3-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > 16/22 : samba3-client-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > 17/22 : samba3-debuginfo-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > 18/22 : libsmbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > 19/22 : samba3-doc-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > 20/22 : libsmbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > 21/22 : samba3-utils-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > 22/22 : libwbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > Linking packages to channel.
> > > ERROR: Package arch x86_64 incompatible with channel
> > > sernet-samba-el5
> > > Sync completed.
> > > Total time: 0:00:06
> > >
> > > The machines to be updated are 32-bit.  I chose IA-32
> > > as the Architecture, and the repo url is
> > > http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5.  If I make
> > > it http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5/i386, I
> > > get "ERROR: Cannot retrieve repository metadata
> > > (repomd.xml) for repostory: sernet-samba-el5. Please
> > > verify its path and try again.
> > >
> > > What's frustrating is that I did have this working
> > > before. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> > >
> > > Dimitri
> > >
> > > --
> > > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > believed to be clean.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > > Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
> >
> > --
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 3
> Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 16:14:48 -0400
> From: Dimitri Yioulos <dyioulos at onpointfc.com>
> To: spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Repo woes
> Message-ID: <201308051614.48585.dyioulos at onpointfc.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain;  charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> Thomas,
> 
> Yes, and yes.
> 
> Dimitri
> 
> 
> On Monday 05 August 2013 4:00:26 pm Thomas Foster wrote:
> > Did you just add the repo?  If so, did you yum clean
> > metadata?
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Lewis Donofrio 
> <lewis.donofrio at gmail.com>wrote:
> > > I'm new here but why not use 2nd party Centos repo's
> > > for samba?
> > >
> > > --
> > > _______________________________________________________
> > >____________ https://www.vizify.com/lewis-donofrio -
> > > 734-743-1743
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Dimitri Yioulos 
> <dyioulos at onpointfc.com>wrote:
> > >> H, all.
> > >>
> > >> I recently upgraded Spacewalk to the latest and
> > >> greatest from version 1.8.  Unfortunately, the upgrade
> > >> didn't go well, and all of my settings were lost.  The
> > >> silver lining here is that, by recreating everything,
> > >> I learned a lot (or, at least, refreshed my memory).
> > >>
> > >> However, I'm having a problem getting on recreated
> > >> cahnnel/repo working.  Many of our Linux boxes use
> > >> Samba; the packages come from Sernet.  I created the
> > >> channel and repo for my CentOS 5 systems, but the repo
> > >> won't sync. When I try to sync from the command line,
> > >> here's the output I get:
> > >>
> > >> spacewalk-repo-sync --channel sernet-samba-el5 --type
> > >> yum Repo URL:
> > >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5 Packages in
> > >> repo:                22
> > >> Packages already synced:          0
> > >> Packages to sync:                22
> > >> 1/22 : samba3-utils-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 2/22 : samba3-winbind-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 3/22 : libsmbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 4/22 : libwbclient0-32bit-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 5/22 : libwbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 6/22 : samba3-doc-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 7/22 : libwbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 8/22 : samba3-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 9/22 : samba3-debuginfo-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 10/22 : samba3-client-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 11/22 : libsmbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > >> 12/22 : samba3-winbind-32bit-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 13/22 : samba3-winbind-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 14/22 : libwbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 15/22 : samba3-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 16/22 : samba3-client-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 17/22 : samba3-debuginfo-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 18/22 : libsmbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 19/22 : samba3-doc-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 20/22 : libsmbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 21/22 : samba3-utils-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> 22/22 : libwbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > >> Linking packages to channel.
> > >> ERROR: Package arch x86_64 incompatible with channel
> > >> sernet-samba-el5
> > >> Sync completed.
> > >> Total time: 0:00:06
> > >>
> > >> The machines to be updated are 32-bit.  I chose IA-32
> > >> as the Architecture, and the repo url is
> > >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5.  If I make
> > >> it http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5/i386, I
> > >> get "ERROR: Cannot retrieve repository metadata
> > >> (repomd.xml) for repostory: sernet-samba-el5. Please
> > >> verify its path and try again.
> > >>
> > >> What's frustrating is that I did have this working
> > >> before. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> > >>
> > >> Dimitri
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > >> believed to be clean.
> > >>
> > >> _______________________________________________
> > >> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > >> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > > Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> believed to be clean.
> 
> 
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> Message: 4
> Date: Mon, 5 Aug 2013 16:34:10 -0400
> From: Thomas Foster <thomas.foster80 at gmail.com>
> To: spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Repo woes
> Message-ID:
> 	<CAJ44rp6X==VALQ+x_UjzDLjUnoF_UH1VDmz5J8fhT7BrX8Z4iA at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
> 
> What's the output of yum repolist ?
> 
> 
> On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Dimitri Yioulos <dyioulos at onpointfc.com>wrote:
> 
> > Thomas,
> >
> > Yes, and yes.
> >
> > Dimitri
> >
> >
> > On Monday 05 August 2013 4:00:26 pm Thomas Foster wrote:
> > > Did you just add the repo?  If so, did you yum clean
> > > metadata?
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:41 PM, Lewis Donofrio
> > <lewis.donofrio at gmail.com>wrote:
> > > > I'm new here but why not use 2nd party Centos repo's
> > > > for samba?
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > _______________________________________________________
> > > >____________ https://www.vizify.com/lewis-donofrio -
> > > > 734-743-1743
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 3:26 PM, Dimitri Yioulos
> > <dyioulos at onpointfc.com>wrote:
> > > >> H, all.
> > > >>
> > > >> I recently upgraded Spacewalk to the latest and
> > > >> greatest from version 1.8.  Unfortunately, the upgrade
> > > >> didn't go well, and all of my settings were lost.  The
> > > >> silver lining here is that, by recreating everything,
> > > >> I learned a lot (or, at least, refreshed my memory).
> > > >>
> > > >> However, I'm having a problem getting on recreated
> > > >> cahnnel/repo working.  Many of our Linux boxes use
> > > >> Samba; the packages come from Sernet.  I created the
> > > >> channel and repo for my CentOS 5 systems, but the repo
> > > >> won't sync. When I try to sync from the command line,
> > > >> here's the output I get:
> > > >>
> > > >> spacewalk-repo-sync --channel sernet-samba-el5 --type
> > > >> yum Repo URL:
> > > >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5 Packages in
> > > >> repo:                22
> > > >> Packages already synced:          0
> > > >> Packages to sync:                22
> > > >> 1/22 : samba3-utils-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > >> 2/22 : samba3-winbind-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > >> 3/22 : libsmbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > >> 4/22 : libwbclient0-32bit-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > >> 5/22 : libwbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > >> 6/22 : samba3-doc-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > >> 7/22 : libwbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > >> 8/22 : samba3-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > >> 9/22 : samba3-debuginfo-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > >> 10/22 : samba3-client-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > >> 11/22 : libsmbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.x86_64
> > > >> 12/22 : samba3-winbind-32bit-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > >> 13/22 : samba3-winbind-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > >> 14/22 : libwbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > >> 15/22 : samba3-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > >> 16/22 : samba3-client-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > >> 17/22 : samba3-debuginfo-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > >> 18/22 : libsmbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > >> 19/22 : samba3-doc-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > >> 20/22 : libsmbclient0-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > >> 21/22 : samba3-utils-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > >> 22/22 : libwbclient-devel-3.6.17-45.el5-0.i386
> > > >> Linking packages to channel.
> > > >> ERROR: Package arch x86_64 incompatible with channel
> > > >> sernet-samba-el5
> > > >> Sync completed.
> > > >> Total time: 0:00:06
> > > >>
> > > >> The machines to be updated are 32-bit.  I chose IA-32
> > > >> as the Architecture, and the repo url is
> > > >> http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5.  If I make
> > > >> it http://ftp.sernet.de/pub/samba/3.6/rhel/5/i386, I
> > > >> get "ERROR: Cannot retrieve repository metadata
> > > >> (repomd.xml) for repostory: sernet-samba-el5. Please
> > > >> verify its path and try again.
> > > >>
> > > >> What's frustrating is that I did have this working
> > > >> before. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> > > >>
> > > >> Dimitri
> > > >>
> > > >> --
> > > >> This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > > >> dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > > >> believed to be clean.
> > > >>
> > > >> _______________________________________________
> > > >> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > > >> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > > >> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > > > Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > > > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > This message has been scanned for viruses and
> > dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
> > believed to be clean.
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Spacewalk-list mailing list
> > Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
> >
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL: <https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20130805/0101c749/attachment.html>
> 
> ------------------------------
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
> 
> End of Spacewalk-list Digest, Vol 63, Issue 6
> *********************************************
 		 	   		  
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20131205/e6348b94/attachment.htm>


More information about the Spacewalk-list mailing list