[Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

Amedeo Salvati amedeo at oscert.net
Thu Nov 6 15:59:57 UTC 2014


   @daryl
   did you use relative path for specifically centos 6.5 like:
   /mirrors/CentOS/6.5
   or you use generic 6 version? like:
   /mirrors/CentOS/6
   both for base and updates, because centos repos when release new minor release will empty updates directory on the last one
   best regards
   a

   Da: spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com

   A: spacewalk-list at redhat.com

   Cc:

   Data: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 16:44:25 +0100

   Oggetto: Re: [Spacewalk-list] How can my CentOS 6.5 be up to date?

   > Daryl Rose wrote:

   > % I just recently installed Spacewalk on a CentOS 6.6 server. I created a

   > % 6.5 channel and repository and I just stood up a CentOS 6.5 client server

   > % and registered it on to the Spacewalk server.

   > %

   > % When I initially stood up the 6.5 client, I looked to see how many how many

   > % updated packages it needed by doing a "yum update". It needed 264

   > % packages, however, I DID NOT perform the update. Just looking. I then

   > % registered the 6.5 client with the Spacewalk server and checked to see if

   > % it was up to date or not. Spacewalk is telling me that the client is

   > % up-to-date. This is not accurate, why?

   >

   > So you have CentOS 6.5 client registered to CentOS 6.5 channel in Spacewalk.

   > And Spacewalk UI says it's up-to-date. Why do you think it isn't accurate?

   >

   > If you don't have 6.6 packages in Spacewalk then it can hardly know about updates.

   >

   > % Thanks.

   > %

   > % Daryl

   >

   > Regards,

   >

   > --

   > Michael Mráka

   > Satellite Engineering, Red Hat

   >

   > _______________________________________________

   > Spacewalk-list mailing list

   > Spacewalk-list at redhat.com

   > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20141106/497d6a24/attachment.htm>


More information about the Spacewalk-list mailing list