[Spacewalk-list] Issue with creating kickstart distribution in spacewalk

Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro waldirio at gmail.com
Wed Oct 1 19:39:38 UTC 2014


Amol

Some points to check

1. Are there in the media these files ?! For example "
sil-scheherazade-fonts-2.010-1.fc20-0.noarch"
2. If yes and SW did the copy, could you check the md5 of boths ?! They
have the same hash !?

B'Regards


______________
Atenciosamente
Waldirio
msn: waldirio at gmail.com
Skype: waldirio
Site: www.waldirio.com.br
Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:19 PM, amol pali <amolpalikondawar at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
> Thanks for the suggestion. I am trying to use reposync with below command
> but it is completing in a minute and not uploading any packages to the
> channel.
> spacewalk-repo-sync -c fedora20-os-only-channel --url file:///media --type
> yum
>
> where I have mounted Fedora20 ISO image under /media.
> Error I am getting as below:
>
> Downloaded package rubygem-passenger-4.0.18-2.fc20.x86_64, from
> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
> 4061/4071 : bluebird-xfwm4-theme-0.9-1.fc20-0.noarch
> Downloaded package bluebird-xfwm4-theme-0.9-1.fc20.noarch, from
> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
> 4062/4071 : ratpoison-1.4.6-3.fc20-0.x86_64
> Downloaded package ratpoison-1.4.6-3.fc20.x86_64, from
> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
> 4063/4071 : xfce4-mailwatch-plugin-1.2.0-2.fc20-0.x86_64
> Downloaded package xfce4-mailwatch-plugin-1.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64, from
> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
> 4064/4071 : mplus-2c-fonts-056-1.fc20-0.noarch
> Downloaded package mplus-2c-fonts-056-1.fc20.noarch, from
> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
> 4065/4071 : rarian-compat-0.8.1-10.fc20-0.x86_64
> Downloaded package rarian-compat-0.8.1-10.fc20.x86_64, from
> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
> 4066/4071 : webkitgtk3-doc-2.2.2-2.fc20-0.noarch
> Downloaded package webkitgtk3-doc-2.2.2-2.fc20.noarch, from
> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
> 4067/4071 : thai-scalable-kinnari-fonts-0.5.0-7.fc20-0.noarch
> Downloaded package thai-scalable-kinnari-fonts-0.5.0-7.fc20.noarch, from
> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
> 4068/4071 : xsane-gimp-0.999-7.fc20-0.x86_64
> Downloaded package xsane-gimp-0.999-7.fc20.x86_64, from
> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
> 4069/4071 : libXfixes-devel-5.0.1-2.fc20-0.x86_64
> Downloaded package libXfixes-devel-5.0.1-2.fc20.x86_64, from
> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
> 4070/4071 : perl-Net-HTTP-6.06-4.fc20-0.noarch
> Downloaded package perl-Net-HTTP-6.06-4.fc20.noarch, from
> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
> 4071/4071 : sil-scheherazade-fonts-2.010-1.fc20-0.noarch
> Downloaded package sil-scheherazade-fonts-2.010-1.fc20.noarch, from
> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
> Linking packages to channel.
> Repo file:///media has comps file comps.xml.
> Repo file:///media has 0 errata.
> Sync completed.
> Total time: 0:00:09
>
> I have updated Spacewalk to the latest version with Nightly build. Still
> same issue.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Michael Mraka <michael.mraka at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>> amol pali wrote:
>> % Hi,
>> % Thanks for your previous response which resolved my issue.
>> % I have one more issue. The rhnpush is pushing RPMs into the channel from
>> % local ISO image very slow.
>> % I think it is taking more than 4 hours to push ISO image of
>> approximately
>> % 4GB. Is it normal or I need to do something about it?
>> % The rhnpush command I am using is:
>> %
>> % rhnpush -vv --server 127.0.0.1 -u amol -p ***  --channel rhel6.5-os-only
>> % /a/Packages/*.rpm
>> %
>> % I have mounted RHEL6.5 ISO Image under /a.
>>
>> Use spacewalk-repo-sync instead of rhnpush; it's faster.
>>
>> % Regards,
>> % Amol
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> --
>> Michael Mráka
>> Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20141001/aa109baf/attachment.htm>


More information about the Spacewalk-list mailing list