[Spacewalk-list] Issue with creating kickstart distribution in spacewalk

Wed Oct 1 21:56:52 UTC 2014

Hi,
Thanks for your response.
This ISO image should be perfect as I burned it to DVD and installed the
system where I m using Spacewalk(Fedora20)
Still I did a check and sha256sum appears to be correct.
I verified this value from the site :
https://fedoraproject.org/static/checksums/Fedora-20-x86_64-CHECKSUM
Output from my machine as below:

[root at rhel1 OS]# sha256sum Fedora-20-x86_64-DVD.iso
f2eeed5102b8890e9e6f4b9053717fe73031e699c4b76dc7028749ab66e7f917
Fedora-20-x86_64-DVD.iso

Regards,
Amol

On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 8:39 PM, Waldirio Manhães Pinheiro <
waldirio at gmail.com> wrote:

> Amol
>
> Some points to check
>
> 1. Are there in the media these files ?! For example "
> sil-scheherazade-fonts-2.010-1.fc20-0.noarch"
> 2. If yes and SW did the copy, could you check the md5 of boths ?! They
> have the same hash !?
>
> B'Regards
>
>
> ______________
> Atenciosamente
> Waldirio
> msn: waldirio at gmail.com
> Skype: waldirio
> Site: www.waldirio.com.br
> Blog: blog.waldirio.com.br
> LinkedIn: http://br.linkedin.com/pub/waldirio-pinheiro/22/b21/646
> PGP: www.waldirio.com.br/public.html
>
> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 4:19 PM, amol pali <amolpalikondawar at gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> Thanks for the suggestion. I am trying to use reposync with below command
>> but it is completing in a minute and not uploading any packages to the
>> channel.
>> spacewalk-repo-sync -c fedora20-os-only-channel --url file:///media
>> --type yum
>>
>> where I have mounted Fedora20 ISO image under /media.
>> Error I am getting as below:
>>
>> Downloaded package rubygem-passenger-4.0.18-2.fc20.x86_64, from
>> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
>> 4061/4071 : bluebird-xfwm4-theme-0.9-1.fc20-0.noarch
>> Downloaded package bluebird-xfwm4-theme-0.9-1.fc20.noarch, from
>> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
>> 4062/4071 : ratpoison-1.4.6-3.fc20-0.x86_64
>> Downloaded package ratpoison-1.4.6-3.fc20.x86_64, from
>> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
>> 4063/4071 : xfce4-mailwatch-plugin-1.2.0-2.fc20-0.x86_64
>> Downloaded package xfce4-mailwatch-plugin-1.2.0-2.fc20.x86_64, from
>> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
>> 4064/4071 : mplus-2c-fonts-056-1.fc20-0.noarch
>> Downloaded package mplus-2c-fonts-056-1.fc20.noarch, from
>> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
>> 4065/4071 : rarian-compat-0.8.1-10.fc20-0.x86_64
>> Downloaded package rarian-compat-0.8.1-10.fc20.x86_64, from
>> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
>> 4066/4071 : webkitgtk3-doc-2.2.2-2.fc20-0.noarch
>> Downloaded package webkitgtk3-doc-2.2.2-2.fc20.noarch, from
>> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
>> 4067/4071 : thai-scalable-kinnari-fonts-0.5.0-7.fc20-0.noarch
>> Downloaded package thai-scalable-kinnari-fonts-0.5.0-7.fc20.noarch, from
>> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
>> 4068/4071 : xsane-gimp-0.999-7.fc20-0.x86_64
>> Downloaded package xsane-gimp-0.999-7.fc20.x86_64, from
>> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
>> 4069/4071 : libXfixes-devel-5.0.1-2.fc20-0.x86_64
>> Downloaded package libXfixes-devel-5.0.1-2.fc20.x86_64, from
>> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
>> 4070/4071 : perl-Net-HTTP-6.06-4.fc20-0.noarch
>> Downloaded package perl-Net-HTTP-6.06-4.fc20.noarch, from
>> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
>> 4071/4071 : sil-scheherazade-fonts-2.010-1.fc20-0.noarch
>> Downloaded package sil-scheherazade-fonts-2.010-1.fc20.noarch, from
>> fedora20-os-only-channel, but it was invalid.
>> Linking packages to channel.
>> Repo file:///media has comps file comps.xml.
>> Repo file:///media has 0 errata.
>> Sync completed.
>> Total time: 0:00:09
>>
>> I have updated Spacewalk to the latest version with Nightly build. Still
>> same issue.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 1, 2014 at 11:40 AM, Michael Mraka <michael.mraka at redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> amol pali wrote:
>>> % Hi,
>>> % Thanks for your previous response which resolved my issue.
>>> % I have one more issue. The rhnpush is pushing RPMs into the channel
>>> from
>>> % local ISO image very slow.
>>> % I think it is taking more than 4 hours to push ISO image of
>>> approximately
>>> % 4GB. Is it normal or I need to do something about it?
>>> % The rhnpush command I am using is:
>>> %
>>> % rhnpush -vv --server 127.0.0.1 -u amol -p ***  --channel
>>> rhel6.5-os-only
>>> % /a/Packages/*.rpm
>>> %
>>> % I have mounted RHEL6.5 ISO Image under /a.
>>>
>>> Use spacewalk-repo-sync instead of rhnpush; it's faster.
>>>
>>> % Regards,
>>> % Amol
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> --
>>> Michael Mráka
>>> Satellite Engineering, Red Hat
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20141001/ca3afd65/attachment.htm>