[Spacewalk-list] Spacewalk as Virtual Host?

[Thomas]

Depends on what is easier for you:

a) managing a configuration more or less nobody else is using and re-test it yourself with every update

b) run a dedicated system and use the same config as the mass of the users

- Thomas

Am 7. März 2016 06:09:43 MEZ, schrieb Lachlan Musicman <datakid at gmail.com>:
>Hi,
>
>We have installed Spacewalk on a "utilities" server, and I would like
>to
>change Spacewalk to a virtualhost set up in Apache2 so we can serve a
>number of services through Apache2 (Icinga, etc).
>
>The only advice I've found is an email from this list - but it's now 6
>years old.
>
>https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2010-February/msg00206.html
>
>Do people still recommend against it?
>
>cheers
>L.
>
>------
>The most dangerous phrase in the language is, "We've always done it
>this
>way."
>
>- Grace Hopper
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>_______________________________________________
>Spacewalk-list mailing list
>Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
>https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20160307/ea7a75a6/attachment.htm>