[Spacewalk-list] Spacewalk as Virtual Host?

[Jim Howland]

We’ve run Spacewalk on a VMWare host for 3 years with no issues (v1.9 and now v2.4  - 16Gb RAM – 4 cores – 350Gb /var filesystem) – manages about 250 servers

Kind Regards,
Jim

From: Thomas [mailto:thomas at chaschperli.ch]
Sent: Monday, 7 March 2016 7:09 PM
To: spacewalk-list at redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Spacewalk as Virtual Host?

Depends on what is easier for you:

a) managing a configuration more or less nobody else is using and re-test it yourself with every update

b) run a dedicated system and use the same config as the mass of the users

- Thomas
Am 7. März 2016 06:09:43 MEZ, schrieb Lachlan Musicman <datakid at gmail.com<mailto:datakid at gmail.com>>:
Hi,
We have installed Spacewalk on a "utilities" server, and I would like to change Spacewalk to a virtualhost set up in Apache2 so we can serve a number of services through Apache2 (Icinga, etc).
The only advice I've found is an email from this list - but it's now 6 years old.

https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2010-February/msg00206.html

Do people still recommend against it?
cheers
L.

------
The most dangerous phrase in the language is, "We've always done it this way."

- Grace Hopper

________________________________

Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list at redhat.com<mailto:Spacewalk-list at redhat.com>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
********
This message (including any attachments ) is confidential and is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you have received this message by mistake please notify the sender by return email and delete this message from your system. Any unauthorised use or dissemination of this message in whole or in part is strictly prohibited.
********
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20160307/cbc02fa8/attachment.htm>