[Spacewalk-list] Spacewalk Client sees Zero packages from a single repo channel
Jiří Dostál
jdostal at redhat.com
Wed Aug 16 14:27:18 UTC 2017
Alright, good points. Could you please verify that data in
"/var/cache/rhn/repodata/" on server-side are correct for given channel?
Jiri
Dne 16.8.2017 v 16:12 Ron Skantz napsal(a):
>
> Some additional information - I have also registered another client
> and it is showing the same symptoms.
>
> Both of these clients were registered to a Spacewalk 2.1 host and I
> have deleted them from there and added them to this new Spacewalk 2.6
> host. The channels are the same names in both versions, but then some
> of them show up fine and this base CentOS 6 channel doesn’t.
>
> If nobody else has an idea I may try to recreate the centos-x86_64
> channel, but I’m skeptical whether that would actually fix the problem
> since the centos-x86_64 channel looks totally normal when viewed in
> the host web UI and it updates correctly with the
> “/usr/bin/spacewalk-repo-sync” command.
>
> *From:*spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com
> [mailto:spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com] *On Behalf Of *Jirí Dostál
> *Sent:* Wednesday, August 16, 2017 9:52 AM
> *To:* spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> *Subject:* Re: [Spacewalk-list] Spacewalk Client sees Zero packages
> from a single repo channel
>
> Hi Ron,
>
>
> it's usually a good thing to run "yum clean all" after registering a
> client, just to make sure the repository cache is flushed. "yum clean
> all" should do the thing, if not try to delete it manually in
> /var/cache/yum/. Next run of "yum repolist" should display package
> numbers correctly.
>
> Regards,
> Jiri
>
> Dne 16.8.2017 v 15:21 Ron Skantz napsal(a):
>
> When I do a "yum repolist" from a recently registered client it
> shows the status of 0 packages for one of the repo channels that
> on the Spacwalk host shows: 6706 packages.
>
> Why would a single channel show no packages?
>
> If you have access to redhat docs then maybe you have been blessed
> with the answer – it sounds like this link may have the answer:
> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/45811
> <https://access.redhat.com/solutions/45811>
>
> I don’t know if images work in this email list but here is the
> command output example:
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
>
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com <mailto:Spacewalk-list at redhat.com>
>
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Spacewalk-list mailing list
> Spacewalk-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20170816/64149e4a/attachment.htm>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 21908 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20170816/64149e4a/attachment.png>
More information about the Spacewalk-list
mailing list