[Spacewalk-list] Issues with SW 2.8 and Ubuntu 18.04 Clients

Javier.Flores at gmz.migros.ch Javier.Flores at gmz.migros.ch
Thu Aug 29 11:47:54 UTC 2019


Hi

Yes, there is no solution for this. As far as I understood, the way Ubuntu names some their packages doesn’t make it easy to solve this problem in Spacewalk.

I can live with this. I only have a couple of Ubuntu systems registered and for APT this is not an issue.

If it bothers you, I guess you could remove the packages from the channels and exclude them in the repository configuration so they wouldn’t show up in Spacewalk anymore. You would have to check the package dependencies first to make sure you don’t break anything.

Regards,
Javier


Von: spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com <spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com> Im Auftrag von Thomas Müller
Gesendet: Thursday, August 29, 2019 12:59 PM
An: spacewalk-list at redhat.com
Betreff: Re: [Spacewalk-list] Issues with SW 2.8 and Ubuntu 18.04 Clients

Hi Javier,

no luck, it ends with the result like in the latest statement from ppanon-avi in Bugzilla Report...

Am Mi., 28. Aug. 2019 um 14:03 Uhr schrieb <Javier.Flores at gmz.migros.ch<mailto:Javier.Flores at gmz.migros.ch>>:
Hi Thomas

Did you see this?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1661347

Regards,
Javier

Von: spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com<mailto:spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com> <spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com<mailto:spacewalk-list-bounces at redhat.com>> Im Auftrag von Thomas Müller
Gesendet: Wednesday, August 28, 2019 1:44 PM
An: spacewalk-list at redhat.com<mailto:spacewalk-list at redhat.com>
Betreff: [Spacewalk-list] Issues with SW 2.8 and Ubuntu 18.04 Clients

Hi,
who may give me a hint for solving the following issue?
Ubuntu 18.04 Clients on SW 2.8 want to update some packages:

Neuestes Paket (new)                                                       Installiertes Paket (installed)

gcc-8-base-8-20180414-1ubuntu2.amd64-deb                 gcc-8-base-8.3.0-6ubuntu1~18.04.1.amd64-deb
libgcc1-8-20180414-1ubuntu2:1.amd64-deb                    libgcc1-8.3.0-6ubuntu1~18.04.1:1.amd64-deb
libpython2.7-2.7.15~rc1-1ubuntu0.1.amd64-deb              libpython2.7-2.7.15-4ubuntu4~18.04.amd64-deb
libpython2.7-minimal-2.7.15~rc1-1ubuntu0.1.amd64-deb libpython2.7-minimal-2.7.15-4ubuntu4~18.04.amd64-deb
libpython2.7-stdlib-2.7.15~rc1-1ubuntu0.1.amd64-deb     libpython2.7-stdlib-2.7.15-4ubuntu4~18.04.amd64-deb
libstdc++6-8-20180414-1ubuntu2.amd64-deb                  libstdc++6-8.3.0-6ubuntu1~18.04.1.amd64-deb
python2.7-2.7.15~rc1-1ubuntu0.1.amd64-deb                  python2.7-2.7.15-4ubuntu4~18.04.amd64-deb
python2.7-minimal-2.7.15~rc1-1ubuntu0.1.amd64-deb    python2.7-minimal-2.7.15-4ubuntu4~18.04.amd64-deb

But, the installed packages are newer (from bionic-update main channel)

I've applied all known tricks and workarounds for .deb packagehandling (multiarch-.headers, gpg-signing).

A comparison between the patched Packages in /var/cache/rhn/repodata/<channel> and the original shows multi-arch headers in both files:

spacewalk:

Package: gcc-8-base
Version: 8.3.0-6ubuntu1~18.04.1
Architecture: amd64
Maintainer: Ubuntu Core developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com<mailto:ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com>>
Installed-Size: 113
Filename: XMLRPC/GET-REQ/bionic-main-updates/getPackage/gcc-8-base_8.3.0-6ubuntu1~18.04.1.amd64-deb.deb
Size: 18716
SHA256: 89415e0e9d940c81e33959f366f1bad1a94cfecacb538eb897be0e6038781a94
Section: libs
Description: GCC, the GNU Compiler Collection (base package)
This package contains files common to all languages and libraries
contained in the GNU Compiler Collection (GCC).
Multi-Arch: same
Priority: required
Source: gcc-8
Origin: Ubuntu
Original-Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers <debian-gcc at lists.debian.org<mailto:debian-gcc at lists.debian.org>>
Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug
MD5sum: b231d33f61250fee66d1f4f41eebe9a0
SHA1: c56356523711c4b9f3f59cc4423254e4a293f46e
Homepage: http://gcc.gnu.org/
Task: minimal
Description-md5: b6e93638a6d08ea7a18929d7cf078e5d
Supported: 5y

Original:

Package: gcc-8-base
Architecture: amd64
Version: 8.3.0-6ubuntu1~18.04.1
Multi-Arch: same
Priority: required
Section: libs
Source: gcc-8
Origin: Ubuntu
Maintainer: Ubuntu Core developers <ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com<mailto:ubuntu-devel-discuss at lists.ubuntu.com>>
Original-Maintainer: Debian GCC Maintainers <debian-gcc at lists.debian.org<mailto:debian-gcc at lists.debian.org>>
Bugs: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+filebug
Installed-Size: 113
Filename: pool/main/g/gcc-8/gcc-8-base_8.3.0-6ubuntu1~18.04.1_amd64.deb
Size: 18716
MD5sum: b231d33f61250fee66d1f4f41eebe9a0
SHA1: c56356523711c4b9f3f59cc4423254e4a293f46e
SHA256: 89415e0e9d940c81e33959f366f1bad1a94cfecacb538eb897be0e6038781a94
Homepage: http://gcc.gnu.org/
Description: GCC, the GNU Compiler Collection (base package)
Task: minimal
Description-md5: b6e93638a6d08ea7a18929d7cf078e5d
Supported: 5y


Client packages are from OBS, see https://www.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/2018-September/msg00059.html

Client does'nt (of course) do a downgrade, error:

D: handle_action actionid = 394, version = 2
D: do_call packages.update([['gcc-8-base', '8-20180414', '1ubuntu2', '', 'amd64-deb']],){'cache_only': None}
D: Called update[['gcc-8-base', '8-20180414', '1ubuntu2', '', 'amd64-deb']]
Apt-Spacewalk: Updating sources.list
D: Sending back response(1, 'update failed', {})
D: do_call packages.checkNeedUpdate('rhnsd=1',){}
D: local action status: (0, 'dpkg database not modified since last update (or package list recently updated)', {})
D: rpcServer: Calling XMLRPC registration.welcome_message
[https://ssl.gstatic.com/ui/v1/icons/mail/images/cleardot.gif]



--
kind regards
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Spacewalk-list mailing list
Spacewalk-list at redhat.com<mailto:Spacewalk-list at redhat.com>
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/spacewalk-list


--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen
Thomas Müller
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/spacewalk-list/attachments/20190829/c232bac5/attachment.htm>


More information about the Spacewalk-list mailing list