Voting: Vetoing fedora-usermgmt until FPC makes a decision

[Axel Thimm]

On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 09:31:18AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> 
> 
> On 05.04.2007 09:04, Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 06:44:55AM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> >>
> >> On 04.04.2007 22:31, Axel Thimm wrote:
> >>> Voting topic: Packages should not use fedora-usermgmt or other
> >>> non-standard useradd replacements.
> >>>
> >>> Background: Large thread starting at
> >>> https://www.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/2007-March/msg00029.html,
> >>> also many threads on various non-epel lists, too many to list here.
> >>>
> >>> Voting period: until 20070410 UTC 23:59
> >> Same as in the other mail. Sum the discussions up before asking for a
> >> voting.
> > 
> > I'm probably too biased (or at least I can't see any cons in dropping
> > this), and I think people here have seen way too much of this
> > discussion on 3 lists over a month by now.
> 
> Con: [...]
> 
> Con: [...]

Looks like you aren't biased at all. ;)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://listman.redhat.com/archives/epel-devel-list/attachments/20070405/fb549bbf/attachment.sig>