[Ambassadors] Active/Inactive Ambassadors

[Francesco Ugolini]

Have you another solution ?

Francesco Ugolini

Brian Pepple ha scritto:
> On Tue, 2007-04-03 at 10:02 -0400, David Nalley wrote:
>> Matthias Kranz wrote:
>>
>>> But again, I still think neither removing inactive ambassadors nor the
>>> introduction of a different title helps the Ambassadors Project being
>>> more productive.
>> Thats a great question! What's the benefit? How does a purge, or honor
>> title creation help the Ambassadors Project achieve it's goal more
>> effectively?
>>
>> Our goals (per the wiki) are to:
>> # Represent Fedora Project to the wider public
>> # Help spread the word about Fedora, Linux, and Open Source
>> # Be a point of contact for local community members and channel the
>> feedback to Fedora Project
>> # Help recruit project contributors
>> # Think of creative ways for promoting Fedora in your region
>>
>> Which of those goals are we accomplishing when we do this.
>> The closest thing that I can think of is that we 'scare' or motivate
>> people who so desperately want to hang onto the title 'Ambassador' into
>> doing the minimum amount of work necessary to retain said title and
>> engendering much ill will in the process which seems counter to our goals.
> 
> +1.  This does nothing to help the problem, and will only serve to drive
> users away from the project.  Frankly, I can't even believe this is
> being discussed.
> 
> /B
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> --
> Fedora-ambassadors-list mailing list
> Fedora-ambassadors-list at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-ambassadors-list

-- 
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FrancescoUgolini