openoffice 2.0 & FC4 - status, plans

Paul paul at
Sat Feb 12 16:36:44 UTC 2005


>> I'd love to see OOo2(beta) incorporated into rawhide today if truth be
>> told as it is way and above better than the standard OOo. I can see the
>> RH arguments against it though, but given that the schedule for both to
>> be released is about the same time, a small delay in FC4 to incorporate
>> it would be acceptable (IMO at least).
>Fedora isn't just about OOo though.  There are a lot of other packages in the 
>distribution and slipping FC4 just to wait for a build of OOo that may/may not 
>be coming out soon after the FC4 freeze date seems a bit presumptuous.  However, 
>since it is a fairly important app, its schedule may get more weight than, say, 
>gcalctool.  As we get nearer to the freeze, we'll have a clearer picture of the 
>schedules of both FC4 and OOo 2.0, and Fedora has been known to slip due to 
>other reasons too.

Fair enough. I'm not sure how important it comes in the stakes, but IMO,
it's well up there with the developer toolchain.


"I don't know how World War III will be fought, but I do know World War
IV will be fought with sticks and stones" - Einstein
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <>

More information about the fedora-devel-list mailing list